Laserfiche WebLink
Activities in 1986 which were supported in full or in part by non- <br />tax revenues are as follows: <br />Sewer Utility <br />Water Utility <br />Storm Utility <br />Golf Course <br />Ice Arena Operating <br />Code Enforcement <br />Economic Development <br />Finance Department <br />Recreation Programs <br />10Q% <br />100% <br />100% <br />100% <br />90% <br />100% <br />100% <br />70% <br />970 <br />It is necessary to review the fees and charges annually to <br />determine if increases are needed or justified. For example, at <br />year end the utility funds were reviewed and increases recommended <br />to cover projected costs. The Recreation Department programs <br />(golf, Ice Arena, recreation) are reviewed at budget time and <br />adjustments made where appropriate. Fees from the Code Enforce- <br />ment activity come primarily from the building, plumbing, and <br />electrical permit fees. The building permit fees have been <br />adjusted in 1987. <br />The Economic Development activity is financed from tax incre- <br />ments, IDB fees, and planning application fees. <br />The Finance Department is considering expanding its marketing of <br />motor vehicle registrations. The objective will be to cover more <br />costs of the Finance Department activities. <br />There are certain activities which do not easily lend themselves <br />to charges and fees such as snow plowing, park maintenance, and <br />police and fire service. However, we continue to look at possi- <br />bilities for these traditional property tax financed services. <br />For example, approximately ninety-eight percent of the police <br />alarm calls were false, and nearly fifty percent of the fire <br />calls are false alarms. In early 1987, the Council adopted an <br />ordinance providing for the imposition of a fee for repetitive <br />false alarms. <br />Indicators of Financial Management <br />A survey was made of seventeen cities (including Roseville) with <br />population between 25,000 and 85,000. The average population of <br />the group was 39,697, and all were suburban communities within <br />the metropolitan area. Using 1986 data, the following factors <br />were compared. <br />Mill Rate - See Table "5" <br />Roseville had the second lowest mill rate of 13.5. The <br />average mill rate was 18.7, with Edina at 11.3 (lowest) and <br />Apple Valley at 25.7 (highest). <br />Tax Burden Per Capita - See Table "5" <br />Roseville has the seventh lowest per capita tax burden of <br />$123.81. The average per capita tax burden was $141.42, with <br />Coon Rapids $95.59 (lowest) and Eden Prairie at $211.31 <br />(highest). <br />