Laserfiche WebLink
IMPLEMENTATION <br />The following two graphs show two measurea of Roseville's debt <br />burden. One shows diract debt as a percent of estimated ma=ket <br />value. The other shows direct debt per capita. Soth graphs <br />iaclude a comparison to the median of other citiea for the yeara <br />of 1983-1992. <br />DIRECT DEBT AS A PERCENT OF E.M,V.' <br />TEN- YEAR SIIMMARY <br />ns- <br />2.a�s- <br />2x- <br />1.6%- <br />��v \ � <br />NG - AA� � <br />,,�,� <br />; <br />�.5'f - ' � .; � � :�� <br />\ <br />OX- <br />iD6J 1Vl� 19lb I9E6 19l7 ivee 19E9 1V90 1991 199 <br />� RATIO OF DIREG7 DEBT ��EDIAN FOA CITIFS <br />•641mabtl Yarbt V¢1a� <br />DIRECT DEBT PER CAPITA <br />TEN- YEAR SUMMARY <br />$1600 - <br />$1700- <br />S 1000 - <br />seoo- <br />�\v � <br />$600- \� � �� <br />\ � <br />5�00- �� \v � <br />\� \ <br />$700 ' ' ; �. . <br />SO -19l9 19l� 1965 ICE6 IGl7 19!! 79EG 1990 1941 IGV2 <br />� RATIO OF DIAECT DEB7 � NEDIAN FOA CITIES <br />$ -% <br />