My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Annual_Report_1992_001
Roseville
>
Budget
>
Annual_Report_1992_001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2018 12:37:09 PM
Creation date
6/22/2018 12:36:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FORM P4 <br />Eide Helmeke & Co. <br />Certified Pubiic Accountants & Consultants <br />To the Honorable Mayor and <br />Memben of the City Council <br />City of Roseville <br />Roseville, Mianesota <br />We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the Ciry of Roseville, Minnesota, for the year ended <br />December 31, 1942, and have issued our report thereon dated March 19, 1993. <br />In coanection with our audit of the general purpose financiai stacements of the City of Roseville, Minnesoca, as <br />of and for tbe year ended December 31, 1992, and with our s[udy and evaluation of the Ciry's intemal control <br />systems used ro administer federal financial assistance programs, as requ'ued by Office of Management and <br />Budget Circular A-128, 'Audits of State and Local Go�emments", we selected cenain transactions applicable to <br />cer[ain nonmajor federal financiai assistance program for the year ended December 31, 1942. As required by <br />Circular A-128, we have performed auditing procedures co test compliance with the requirements go�emin8 tYPes <br />of services allowed or unallowed, reportiug and speciai requiremen[s including timiag of ezpendinues, <br />environmencal reviews and program income, thac are applicable ro those transactions. Our procedures were <br />substancially 1ess in scope than an audit, the objective of wfiich is [be expression of an opinion on the Ci[}Ts <br />compliance with these requirements. Accordiagly, we do noe express such an opinion. <br />With respect 2o the items tested, the resu![s of those procedures disciosed no instances of noncomptiance with <br />the requirements listed in the preceding paragraph. Wich respect to items not [es[ed, no[hing came eo our <br />attention that causcd us [o belie�e that the City of Roseviile, Minnesota, had not compGed, in all matenal <br />respects, with those requirements. <br />This report is iatended for the informacion of m�nagement, the ciry council, sta[e agencies, the federal cogai;ant <br />audit agency and other federal agencies. Howe�er, this repon is a ma[ter of public record and i[s distribucion <br />is not limited. <br />�c�G �/��'L`� d % . <br />March 19, 1993 <br />Minneapolis. Minnesoca <br />108 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.