My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0618
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2018 3:36:58 PM
Creation date
7/12/2018 3:36:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/18/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 18, 2018 <br /> Page 10 <br /> towards creating more meeting spaces. As the Council puts forward the commu- <br /> nity survey, it will be interesting to see if that perspective has changed or not. He <br /> believes that connectivity will continue to be an important issue. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte thanked the PRC for its hard work. <br /> Mayor Roe commented one way to get more involvement in the natural resources <br /> efforts would be to recruit local companies who are looking for things for their <br /> employees to become involved in. He also suggested thinking about going to na- <br /> tive plantings in some parks to reduce the amount of maintenance needed. <br /> Mayor Roe thanked the Commission for their joint meeting. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 7:46 p.m., and reconvened at approximately <br /> 7:48 p.m. <br /> . • ► • . . • . I . . .. . . . . . . .. • . . _ , • . • . •. . • . <br /> 578 Ryan_ Ave W <br /> e. Consider a Request to Perform an Abatement of Unresolved Violations at <br /> 1693 Ridgewood Ln N <br /> Building Official Englund briefly reviewed this request, recommending approval <br /> as detailed in the RCA dated June 18, 2018. He noted the renter of the property is <br /> moving forward with purchasing the property. This is the information given to <br /> staff, though there is nothing in writing. The fence is in disrepair in two areas, <br /> and staff is asking for corrections. There is also a large mulch/leaves/debris pile <br /> at the back of the fence that the resident indicated was being taken care of, but it <br /> has not been addressed. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted this house has been in abatement before, and the <br /> issue was the fence was falling down. She asked what the resident has in mind to <br /> repair the fence. The City should not have to keep returning to this property over <br /> and over. <br /> Building Official Englund responded he has talked with the resident about remov- <br /> ing the fence and leaving it open or installing a new fence. He told the resident <br /> that with the abatement process, the entire fence could be removed and it could be <br /> applied to the taxes. The resident said he would think about it and that he would <br /> just make repairs. This fence was abated 5 years ago, and it was set for abatement <br /> one year ago, but the owner made enough progress to meet the minimum re- <br /> quirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.