2018_07-24_PWETCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Proposal Evaluation Criteria The following information must be included in each Proposal and will form the basis of the evaluation. Proposals will be reviewed and awarded eligibility points for each of the selection criteria below, with a maximum of one -hundred (100) points. For each criterion, the reviewers may award none, some, or all eligibility points. VALUE OF THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT (65 points) The proposed Project should include identification of proposed Project area and highlight the value of the project to provide information useful to regional communities. It is understood that the project area may change due to results of flow monitoring or project constraints. Previous I&I mitigation study projects have consisted mainly of public infrastructure rehabilitation. The intent of this Project is to expand knowledge of I&I rehabilitation techniques and strategies implemented to locate and mitigate sources of I&I in private infrastructure — such as micro -metering, source detection, and effectiveness of private sewer lateral rehabilitation. Up to sixty-five (65) eligibility points will be awarded for complete responses to each of the items below. The Proposal should be developed in sufficient detail to allow MCES to assess the following: A. How the Project will provide a broader benefit to the region. This may include information on the strategy, technique, technology, or method selected that may be useful to other regional communities that discharge to the MDS. (10 points) B. A description of how the Proposer will monitor, report, and evaluate the wastewater flow and rainfall data; including: • Use of micro -metering technology to identify and locate sources of I&I within the community or proposed project area (10 points); • the proposed schedule, monitoring plan, and project milestones (10 points); • the data collection process, which should include a plan to collect and store flow and rainfall data continually to reduce the likelihood of loss of data during the Project (10 points); • how the data collected will be evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the I&I mitigation strategy (10 points); and • how the project will account for other variables that affect wastewater flow — such as water conservation, I&I from public infrastructure, or others (5 points). C. Conceptual physical characteristics of the proposed project area, including suitability for flow monitoring. (5 points) D. Historical information that is relevant to the reviewer in determining if the proposed Project area would benefit from I&I mitigation. This could include a narrative of how and why the proposed Project area would benefit from I&I mitigation, or flow history that indicates high rates of 1&1. (5 points) ABILITY TO COMPLETE AND MANAGE THE PROJECT (15 points) The Proposal should indicate how the project team is able to effectively implement and manage the Project. Up to three (3) eligibility points will be awarded for complete responses to each of the following: • Include the name and qualifications of the project manager anticipated to lead this project. Include descriptions of other key staff included on the project team, including consultants or contractors. • Describe assumptions used in design of the project and how these can be addressed or controlled during the implementation. • Describe any local ordinances or project -specific approvals that are needed. • Describe how this Project is part of the larger strategy by the community to reduce I&I. • Describe the long-term monitoring plan to be implemented for the Project area. AGE OF HOUSING (10 points) Page - 3 1 July 9, 2018 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL