My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-8-2_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2018
>
2018-8-2_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 3:47:03 PM
Creation date
7/26/2018 3:46:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Process: <br />It has beena long road of community engagement, planning & development,industry expertise, & local <br />leadership that led to the authorization & realization of the Cedarholm Community Building project. We are <br />excited to take an aging golf course clubhouse & rebuild/repurpose the facility into a welcoming community <br />building. <br />Project milestones include: <br />2014: City Council, Parks & Recreation Commission explore needs & considerations. <br />Due to increased capital needs & the clubhouse facility becoming more functionally obsolete, the <br />Roseville City Council (Council) & the Parks & Recreation Commission (Commission) began <br />evaluating/considering Cedarholm Clubhouse needs. The Council directed Commissioners to work with <br />staff to review current & future operations, as well as capital needs of the Golf Course & provide <br />recommendations. During the Commission’s review & evaluation of Cedarholm’s operations & <br />infrastructure conditions, discussions centered on whether it made sense to address capital needs by <br />repairing, renovating or replacing the 55-year-old structure to meet current & future needs. <br />2015: Preliminary work, fact finding & project option development. <br />A year-long, Commission led process ensued to evaluate facility operations, appraise facility conditions, <br />analyze the local golf industry, engage the Finance Commission & create a preliminary vision for the <br />future of the Golf Course site. <br />o April: Commission introduced to Cedarholm’s 50-year history & reviewed current golf <br />operations <br />o April & May: Commissioners toured Cedarholm site & continued expanded the discussion of <br />past & current golf operations & financials <br />o June: Commission established a 3-member task force to lead the information gathering & <br />information sharing process <br />o June: Joint City Council & Parks & Recreation Commission resulted in Council direction; <br />Gain a better understanding of what improvements are needed <br />Gain a better understanding of golf opportunities <br />Identify options & cost estimates <br />Work with the Finance Commission to explore financial considerations <br />o November: Joint City Council & Parks & Recreation Commission meeting <br />Commission addressed Council’s June direction & arrived at four options for <br />replacing/improving the Cedarholm Clubhouse. <br />Council requested the Parks & Recreation Commission engage the community to <br />analyze the replacement of the Cedarholm Clubhouse & maintain Community green <br />space to serve current golf needs & future community needs. The Council directed the <br />commission to consider funding options for the replacement & report back with <br />recommendations. <br />Following the November meeting, Commissioners worked with staff to develop an <br />approach for engaging the community in discussion to evaluate the clubhouse & <br />maintain community green space to serve current golf needs & future community <br />needs. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2 | Page <br />2017 Award of Excellence <br />Roseville Parks & Recreation <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.