Laserfiche WebLink
Restricting clear-cutting (removal of all trees in a tract & pesticide use <br />Monitoring the “chain of custody”, or ensuring the wood used in the project came from <br />the forest that was certified <br />o One inch, tempered glass used throughout the building to support temperature control systems <br />& protect the building integrity from golf balls. <br />o Parking lot incorporated permeable pavement to improve water quality as part of a sustainable <br />effort. <br />Complimentary architectural design blends into the surrounding “neighborhoodscape” & aligns with the <br />over-all community style. <br />Expanded community spaces provide a year-round gathering place for the greater community & not just <br />the “golf” community. <br /> <br /> <br />Evaluation Method: <br />Like much of the earlier criteria, there are a variety of evaluation tools & methods used to gauge the success of <br />the Cedarholm Community Building project. <br />Community response & participation levels are the obvious starting points <br />for summarizing evaluation methods. The Cedarholm Community Building <br />project experienced steady growth in community involvement from the onset. <br />Community engagement came in all durations, from those that were involved <br />from start to finish (a more than 4-year commitment) to those that attended <br />a single input session to learn about the project, provide feedback or share <br />expertise. <br />Council, Commission & Administration recognition is a significant evaluation tool. <br />Commissioners held leadership roles throughout the process & took ownership of <br />providing consistent lines of communication with the Council & the Community. <br />City Administration directed the resource package to support the project. <br />Commission & Advisory Team research & analysis paralleled meeting themes & <br />reporting topics including industry trends & forecasts, operational practices & <br />community aspirations. Evaluation of sizes, uses, conditions, costs, interest, <br />opportunities all contributed to project development & approval. <br />Performance based review by the volunteer leadership team led to extensive <br />financial, operational & community impact reporting. The performance review <br />delved into the past 10-years of golf operations & projected performance <br />expectation for a like futures cycle that includes expanded & complementary use. <br />Performance findings equally contributed to the project development & approval. <br />Evaluation findings were documented in the Cedarholm Clubhouse Advisory <br />Team Final Report. This report was accepted by the Roseville City Council & <br />served as a significant tool in the overall process. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />6 | Page <br />2017 Award of Excellence <br />Roseville Parks & Recreation <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />