My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-7-12_PR_Comm_Min
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
2018-7-12_PR_Comm_Min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2018 10:18:33 AM
Creation date
8/8/2018 10:18:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />MEETING MINUTES FOR SPECIAL MEETING <br />July12, 20186:30pm <br />PRESENT:Baggenstoss, Bole,Gelbach,Hoag,Newby,O’Brien,Stoner,Warzecha <br />ABSENT:Heikkila, Quick <br />STAFF:Brokke <br />1)INTRODUCTIONS <br />2)ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />3)PARK DEDICATION –MIDLAND CREST (2237 WEST CLEVELAND DR.) <br />Staff relayed that tonight’sspecial meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was <br />calledin order to discuss and make a recommendation on a time sensitive Park Dedication <br />proposalat 2237 West Cleveland Drive. <br />Staff provided an overview of the property, its location and the specific proposal.The <br />proposed development would combine threeexisting parcelsinto a fivelot subdivision with <br />an out lotin the rear to help capture storm water. <br />Staff refreshed the Commission on the various strategies outlined in the Park and Recreation <br />System Master Plan(Master Plan)to enhance Parks andRecreation opportunities in SW <br />Roseville. <br />ThePark Dedication cash amount would be $8,000 andthe land amount would be.21 acres. <br />As a size comparison reference, the parcel purchased for parklandatthe corner of Cleveland <br />and County Rd. B is .79 acres. <br />The Commissiondiscussed the option for land, including thepotential limited use of a .21 <br />sized parkand the difficulty in reaching that specificarea ofSW Roseville. <br />ChairO’Brien asked if any discussions regarding Park Dedicationland hadhappened with <br />the developer.Staff responded that it was mentionedthat they may not be able to move <br />forward with the development if the land option is exercised. <br />The Commission discussed the need to be very mindful on these types of opportunities and <br />thoroughly considerthe overall benefits to the park system but not to just accept anything in <br />order to satisfy the general lack of Park and Recreation opportunities identified in the Master <br />Plan. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.