My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0723
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0723
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2018 2:06:00 PM
Creation date
8/15/2018 2:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 23,2018 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Mayor Roe stated the existing use table creates some difficulty in seeing how <br /> proposed projects might or might not fit into it. <br /> Member Sparby expressed concern that on the PUD, the projects were pushing <br /> the PC to amend the existing PUD or not, and there was a separate process of <br /> looking at the PUD as a whole. The PC seems to have been in a gray area for a <br /> while now. <br /> Mayor Roe responded the challenge is that the Council is legally required to in- <br /> terpret the Code that is in place at the time. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that with Centre Point, it is the PUD that carries <br /> the day. There was a lot of conversation that sidetracked the issue, i.e., the whole <br /> Office/Business Park conversation. That is not part of it; it is the PUD against <br /> which applications are evaluated. <br /> Chair Murphy asked whether the Council would like the PC to pay particularly <br /> close attention to any part of the Comp Plan or a neighboring community's Comp <br /> Plan. <br /> Councilmember Etten thanked the PC for all its efforts and extra work on the <br /> Comp Plan. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that as Roseville's Comp Plan circles back from the review pe- <br /> riod, he would like to revisit with the residents the areas around HarMar and the <br /> Lexington-Larpenteur area, primarily to possibly clear up any misunderstandings <br /> that may be out there. <br /> Chair Murphy commented that the continued nagging concern for the housing <br /> component is it is not defined. There are multiple ways of executing, with no pre- <br /> ferred avenue mentioned. There is a concept but not a clear way to get to the goal <br /> yet. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated the Comp Plan is a visioning document, and <br /> where the rubber meets the road is when the zoning is put in place. Perhaps when <br /> questions come forward, an educational process can take place. In the short term, <br /> it is really the underlying zoning. In the long term, it is the visionary comprehen- <br /> sive plan. <br /> Vice Chair Bull asked for the Council's perspective on the PC's efforts to reach a <br /> diverse group of people. <br /> Councilmember Etten responded that the plan process from ten years ago was not <br /> as inclusive. This process for the recent Comp Plan update was certainly much <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.