My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018_08-28_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018_08-28_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2018 9:09:33 AM
Creation date
8/31/2018 9:06:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/28/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
263 Member Kruse asked if those were narrow diameters services and do they line it <br />264 up. Mr. Sandstrom stated they have not aligned it, typically it is six inches on right <br />265 of way and then goes down to four inch in the front yards. They would have to <br />266 figure out if they would do to the right of way all the way to the house. It would <br />267 most likely be the right of way if there was the pinch point. <br />268 <br />269 Chair Cihacek stated total possible award is one million dollars with the Council <br />270 and the Commission. This would be approximately $5,000 per house for 200 <br />271 homes. He wondered what that would look like in one of the territories, how much <br />272 that impact really changes or shifts something like 16A or 14, or 6, is that a large <br />273 enough sample that does something impactful, or is it not that large. Mr. <br />274 Freihammer thought if they did the full amount of the grant they would have a very <br />275 impactful amount and would get measurable results and he thought that was why <br />276 the grant is as large as it is. They would be able to cover one or two of the sections. <br />277 They would target one of the areas that peak very high, that way if lining does <br />278 eliminate INI the results would show much clearer than some of the smaller areas, <br />279 so they would target one of the pink or orange segments on the list. <br />280 <br />281 Member Kors asked how this applied to the type of condition the pipe is in. He <br />282 wondered if this will be cast in place like the mainline. Mr. Sandstrom stated this <br />283 would be the same technology as the CIP. It would be a different contractor because <br />284 it is a whole different operational lining the surfaces versus the main but would be <br />285 the same technology. Mr. Freihammer stated if they end up doing this, they would <br />286 have to work out the criteria. If some homes opt in, they would have to decide if <br />287 they do it to everyone. They would have to decide what their criteria is and work <br />288 through details. <br />289 <br />290 Chair Cihacek asked if there would be potential additional costs or is that cost <br />291 included. Mr. Freihammer stated depending on how it is formulated they could <br />292 include the costs because they would need to televise a line before you can line it. <br />293 It is all part of the process. Mr. Sandstrom stated the technology at this point for <br />294 lining sewer lines from the main back, everyone is a custom one for each house. <br />295 Each house gets a custom liner so that would be a part of the project. <br />296 <br />297 Member Kors asked if the pipes slope more as they get to the main line. Mr. <br />298 Sandstrom indicated if the main line is deep there are risers on it. Lining up a riser <br />299 can be tricky and that is why everything would be televised ahead of time. They <br />300 can then determine if it wasn't going to work ahead of time, so they would not <br />301 waste a liner on something that cannot be done. Member Kors thought if it is <br />302 sloping more, they would have a smaller diameter and more capacity than the <br />303 service coming out of the house. Shrinking it will still have the capacity that it had <br />304 before. Mr. Freihammer stated even a four -inch pipe is marginal and loss is not <br />305 significant enough where it would cause an issue. <br />306 <br />307 Member Wozniak asked if this will be applied to a residential service or is it also a <br />308 nonresidential one. Mr. Sandstrom stated the Grant outline is private, they will be <br />Page 7 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.