My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018_0919_HRIEC Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights, Inclusion and Engagement Commission
>
Packets
>
2018
>
2018_0919_HRIEC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2018 4:44:03 PM
Creation date
9/13/2018 4:40:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Human Rights Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/19/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Human Rights, Inclusion and Engagement Commission Minutes <br /> August 15, 2018 —Draft Minutes <br /> Page 8 of 13 <br /> 314 Ms. Olson thought question 6 they could change to "What does community <br /> 315 engagement mean to your department and how does it look". <br /> 316 <br /> 317 The Commission agreed. <br /> 318 <br /> 319 Chair Beltmann thought their landing page could encompass "We are looking at a <br /> 320 community engagement which typically looks like xyz, but it could be broader...", <br /> 321 give an example to help give some framework but not make it leading. <br /> 322 <br /> 323 Commissioner Holub thought it should be as least leading as they can be. <br /> 324 <br /> 325 Chair Beltmann asked if there was any other feedback on the survey questions. <br /> 326 <br /> 327 Commissioner Djevi asked if it would be too much to add a little background to say <br /> 328 this is what they are thinking and not being critical of what any departments are <br /> 329 doing. <br /> 330 <br /> 331 Chair Beltmann thought that could be on the landing page as well. <br /> 332 <br /> 333 The Commission thought that was a great idea. <br /> 334 <br /> 335 Ms. Olson anticipated having an email sent out to the Department Heads to a link to <br /> 336 the survey so in the email she would be happy to include something along those lines <br /> 337 and then the landing page could be as what the Commission discussed. <br /> 338 <br /> 339 Ms. Olson asked for the Commission to review the survey questions in detail, so she <br /> 340 knew what to include. <br /> 341 <br /> 342 Chair Beltmann read through the questions: <br /> 343 <br /> 344 1. Name (removed) <br /> 345 2. Title (removed) <br /> 346 3. Department <br /> 347 4. Email (removed) <br /> 348 5. Landing Page with description and preface of what they are doing. <br /> 349 6. What percentage of your staff does community engagement work? <br /> 350 7. How many people does the department reach(scale given) <br /> 351 8. What does engagement mean to their Department <br /> 352 9. (Old Item 5) Why does the department interact with the community (Multiple <br /> 353 choice options) <br /> 354 10. (Old Item 5) Why do you interact with the Community? (are there specific <br /> 355 reasons, initiatives, topics, issues, statutes) <br /> 356 11. (Old Item 6) How do you typically interact with the Community? <br /> 357 12. (Old Item 7) What engagement strategies does your department use? (i.e. <br /> 358 events, social media, workshops, open houses, etc) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.