My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0917
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 8:59:48 AM
Creation date
10/12/2018 8:59:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/17/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 17, 2018 <br /> Page 12 <br /> keeping that in the levy going forward, presuming the City gets the State Bonding <br /> money for the Oval funds. If the levy is kept at the $355,000 going forward, that <br /> fund balance starts to get pretty high. It appears that if the City maintains the <br /> $355,000 in place through 2024, the City will get through the hump of the funding <br /> and then the City could take that off the funding of the facilities. He recommend- <br /> ed the City look at doing that after six years. <br /> The Commission agreed. <br /> Commissioner Bachhuber stated the Commission saw that as a potential but is <br /> something to be considered once the funding is secured. <br /> Mayor Roe stated the reason he was suggesting looking at that, is because instead <br /> of having a number of levy increases over a number of years for the Pavement <br /> Management Fund, if in 2025 the City repurposed the $355,000 going forward for <br /> the pavement fund, it accomplishes the same thing as a number of smaller levy <br /> increases over a number of different years which seems like fewer steps needed. <br /> This addresses everything the Commission is addressing that needs to be done. <br /> Commissioner Harold indicated the Commission was aware of doing things like <br /> what Mayor Roe suggested. The recommendation shows in 2029, the City would <br /> be pulling money out of this fund. The City is planning for a large expenditure <br /> for the OVAL, but he imagined the Commission would be on board with that <br /> suggestion. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated she was glad the Commission was open to it but <br /> since that would be a big chunk somewhere down the line, she would not be op- <br /> posed to doing some small steps to be sure it is on there. Her concern is if there <br /> was something catastrophic to happen before the six years, then the City would be <br /> in a worse situation if some steps were not taken. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated the discussion around the Facilities Program is a lit- <br /> tle hypothetical now and in 2020, the City may know. The next bonding legisla- <br /> tive session will end in May 2020, so the City will have some clarity by then at <br /> which point a Council will decide if the City needs to do $50,000 per year for <br /> several years as the Commission recommends or $355,000 all at once as the <br /> Mayor recommends. There will be a chance to look at this again before then. <br /> Mayor Roe thanked the Commission for their work. As an organization, the City <br /> had planned in 2018 Budget and Capital Improvement discussion to do a two-year <br /> implementation of funding for the Parks CIP fund and it appears after doing year <br /> one, the City does not need to do year two. He thought that was a nice thing to <br /> see. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.