My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0917
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 8:59:48 AM
Creation date
10/12/2018 8:59:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/17/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 17, 2018 <br /> Page 20 <br /> is the City going to use permit fees to broaden the City-wide expansion. Mr. En- <br /> glund stated it would only be the permits that are not State Building Code related, <br /> which is where the City would allocate that inspector's time and only inspecting <br /> the Zoning Code Permits, signed permits that are not required to maintain a State <br /> Code. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated with the success of the one-third rolling every 3 <br /> years, there is a high compliance rate. He did not see the benefit of going to a full <br /> City-wide inspection based on some of the numbers staff is throwing out to the <br /> Council. If the City knows where the properties are, then perhaps there is a dif- <br /> ferent tactic that can be taken. He did not know if the Council would be properly <br /> allocating resources to go citywide when the City knows it is a very small frac- <br /> tions of the properties the City is having issues with. <br /> Councilmember Etten concurred. He thought the success with using door hangers <br /> this year was fantastic. If this is creating enough efficiency, then maybe Code En- <br /> forcement should go to half of the City and then look at the proactive visit to look <br /> at the top ten to fifteen properties that are going to fit in an expanded time zone of <br /> recurring code violations. Otherwise, he would stick with a third of the City and <br /> get after the code violators. That would be his priority. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed and stated she liked the door hangers and felt <br /> the door hangers worked very well. <br /> Mayor Roe liked the idea of covering half the City each year because Code En- <br /> forcement is getting to all of the City within two years rather than three. He <br /> thought three years gets to be a pretty long time and he understood where it can <br /> become an issue. He did want to voice some support on extending the nuisance to <br /> three violations in a two-year period, which might coincide with covering the City <br /> in two years. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated she liked the idea of every other year doing a <br /> portion of the City so if staff can take the efficiencies that have been found and do <br /> half of the City one year and the other half the next year. She also agreed with <br /> Councilmember Etten in that Code Enforcement does need to be going back to the <br /> problem neighborhoods because it is a different approach. <br /> Mr. Englund stated what brings Code Enforcement back to a specific property. <br /> Mayor Roe thought the City needed to establish a policy that is not being seen as <br /> targeting individuals, but still is proactive. <br /> 3. Create Vacant Property Registry <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.