My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0917
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 8:59:48 AM
Creation date
10/12/2018 8:59:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/17/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 17, 2018 <br /> Page 21 <br /> Mr. Englund reviewed the topic with the Council. He suggested adding into the <br /> Rental Registration Ordinance a requirement for when a building is vacant that it <br /> is registered so the City has a contact. <br /> Mr. Englund reviewed several cities programs and the fees charged. <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked if the vacant property would need to have some <br /> sort of structure on it. Mr. Englund stated it would not. <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked if a resident had a property without a structure <br /> next to their residence would the person need to register that. Mr. Englund stated <br /> the person would if it was a separate address. <br /> Councilmember Willmus thought that the City needed to be careful. This is <br /> something he would be willing to look at but thought this may be something not <br /> needed and overboard. He stated the City needs to be aware and cognizant of <br /> that. Frankly, he felt a vacant lot without a structure next to a home is an asset <br /> and not something that the City needs to go so far as to attempt to monitor that. <br /> Mayor Roe asked in 2013-2014 when there were a lot of vacant properties in the <br /> City, how long did the City need to deal with the vacancy and did the City not get <br /> all the property contacts in order to be notified of violations. <br /> Mr. Englund stated on several properties, the City did abatements after notifying <br /> posting the house without response. The contact back to the City was three to six <br /> months and by that time, the City addressed the nuisance condition. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if the City solved the problem by doing the abatement. Mr. En- <br /> glund stated that was correct. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that may be the way for the City to resolve the issue. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated he was in favor of this and he was okay if the City <br /> wants to exempt vacant lots that that do not have a structure on it. Ideally, he <br /> hoped the City did not have a situation like the City had in 2008-2010 where the <br /> City had so many vacant properties. The City certainly has vacant properties and <br /> it allows the City to keep track of owners. He thought $35 should be a minimum <br /> fee. He thought it makes it easier to enforce any code violations or problems the <br /> City has. He stated this works for the City rental properties, so he did not see why <br /> this would be a big deal for a vacant property. The process clarifies who the City <br /> communicates with about that process and ownership. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte asked what the penalty would be if the owner did not <br /> register the vacant house. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.