My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0924
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 9:03:22 AM
Creation date
10/12/2018 9:03:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/24/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 24, 2018 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Mr. Johnson stated in regard to assessment of County Road C, just because the <br /> property owners have never been assessed does not mean the property owners <br /> should start being assessed. He did not think the property owners should be as- <br /> sessed similar to Walnut. <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Mayor Roe asked what is going to happen on Long Lake Road by County Road C <br /> and is there proposed to be any assessments along Long Lake Road properties or <br /> would there only be assessments along County Road C. <br /> Mr. Culver stated there are no assessments being proposed for Long Lake Road. <br /> The City is doing a mill and overlay on Long Lake Road at the same time in 2019. <br /> The railroad crossing was done this year in anticipation of the roadwork. Mill and <br /> overlays are not assessed, only full street reconstruction is assessed. The County <br /> is fully reconstructing County Road C and just because a property owner is on a <br /> County Road does not mean the property owner should not be subject to assess- <br /> ments if the street is reconstructed. This is why the City is looking at assessing <br /> for the City's portion of those costs on County Road C. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there is a set hearing associated with this. <br /> Mr. Culver indicated there was and property owners would be notified of the pub- <br /> lic hearings and meetings. He indicated nothing along Long Lake Road is being <br /> assessed with this project or the mill and overlay for the roadway in 2019. <br /> Mr. Culver stated what Mr. Johnson was referring to is the City did redo the rail- <br /> road crossing along Long Lake Road with the new concrete crossing and as a part <br /> of that and a new policy the City implemented as a part of the City's new trans- <br /> portation plan, the City does prep all of the railroad crossings now for quiet zone <br /> certification. That does not mean the crossing will be certified for quiet zone <br /> when it is done. But when the City repaves a roadway, the City takes the oppor- <br /> tunity to modify the geometrics, so it will be ready for quiet zone. He stated the <br /> City did put some concrete medians in that area. He showed on the map where <br /> the medians were installed. <br /> Mr. Culver stated the roadway is two lanes each way by the railroad crossing and <br /> does transition into a three-lane section south of the railroad. He stated what the <br /> City is doing as part of the County Road C project is to improve traffic operations <br /> at that intersection, because the southbound leg north of County Road C does ex- <br /> perience quite a bit of congestion, there is not a dedicated left turn phasing for the <br /> southbound movement, and there is only one left turn lane. The City will be mod- <br /> ifying the geometrics in that area to put in a dual left for the southbound move- <br /> ment and still have the thru movement going south. In order to do that, the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.