My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0924
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 9:03:22 AM
Creation date
10/12/2018 9:03:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/24/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 24, 2018 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked if there would be any consideration of under- <br /> grounding the transmission lines at that time. <br /> Mr. Culver stated he did not think the transmission lines were candidates for un- <br /> dergrounding because of the size and the heat generated. <br /> Mr. Culver stated Ramsey County does not require Council approval of the lay- <br /> out. Staff is required to approve it so the City Engineer will sign off on the plans. <br /> Staff felt it is good policy to go through the layout and make sure the Council is in <br /> agreement with the plans. He indicated this also helps with the Chapter 429 pro- <br /> cess because there are processes that need to be followed even though the City is <br /> not advertising the project for bid. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was any public comment to come forward. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Mr. Brad Johnson, 10 Windsor Court,New Brighton <br /> Mr. Johnson stated he was at the meeting representing the building at 2582 Long <br /> Lake Road, the JR Johnson Supply Building. He indicated he was one of the <br /> renters in the building and also representing the owner of the building in this mat- <br /> ter. <br /> Mr. Johnson stated this item has come to his attention. He did not personally re- <br /> ceive any mailing on what may be done on Long Lake Road. He stated he had is- <br /> sues when the railroad came through and upgraded the road near the front of his <br /> business. He noticed a median is being put in the middle, which upset him. <br /> Mr. Johnson recommended a motion that reads: Subject to the engineers' instruc- <br /> tions to talk to the County to maintain all existing southbound traffic lanes, south <br /> of County Road C through the railroad crossing. <br /> Mr. Johnson stated this would allow space for cars to queue up when the train is <br /> using the tracks. He stated the lanes are being reduced from two to one lane and <br /> quite often when a train comes, traffic backs up to County Road C. If reduced to <br /> one lane, traffic will back up even farther to 35W. He stated it provides for accel- <br /> eration, passing lane around slow moving such as large tanker trucks that might <br /> be full of gasoline or hazmat that are mandated to stop at the railroad crossing. <br /> Mr. Johnson stated the plan and median is poorly thought out and there is a lot of <br /> traffic going through the industrial area. He thought changing up the lanes was <br /> not a wise idea and no reason for it. He stated all cement medians should be kept <br /> at a minimum south of County Road C on the stretch of Long Lake Road due to <br /> large semi's turning. He stated the businesses do not get consulted much in that <br /> area of the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.