CC_Minutes_2018_1022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 22, 2018 Page 18 Councilmember Willmus stated he had an opportunity to watch the Planning Commission meeting and was more comfortable with the language staff presented versus what ultimately came out of the Planning Commission meeting. City Attorney Gaughan referenced Attachment C, the proposed Ordinance, line 16, referencing brew pub, and suggested 'who' be replaced with 'at.' On Line 36, regarding site screening, he suggested replacing `attractive' with 'not inappropri- ate.' He noted in the RCA on page 204, line 56, it discusses this and he was not sure if the Planning Commission removed or put it in,but in any event, it is not in the Resolution. He suggested the wording from RCA page 204, line 56 replace the word `attractive.' Similarly, Lines 37 and 38 of Attachment C, discusses a fence between six and six and a half feet in height whereas what was before the Planning Commission was at least six feet in height. Mr. Paschke believed as it relates to the first question, compatible materials to the building, one thing that could be challenged is on an all brick building there would not be an all brick fence constructed or screening wall. He thought staff and the Planning Commission saw that and that was the reason it was removed and talked about what would be a screened fence to go in. Attractive is the cur- rent verbiage the City Code currently has, and it mirrored the current Code. He agreed this is very subjective and could be removed as long as it is kept in that staff can review and approve it as the Community Development Department. He stated as it relates to the change in height, the Planning Commission wanted a maximum and a minimum. Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment. Public Comment Mr. Tim Callaghan, Mr. Callaghan stated he was confused in reading through this about the twenty- five feet from residential. He asked if the twenty-five feet was from the property line or the building. Mayor Roe stated it would be from the property line. Mr. Callaghan thought that should be clarified because someone may argue about that in the future. Mayor Roe closed the public comment with no one else coming forward. Council Discussion Councilmember Etten stated in regard to minimum parking standards, he wanted to move the language found in attachment B, page 2 of 4, with one change.