My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_1203
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_1203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 11:05:24 AM
Creation date
1/11/2019 11:05:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/3/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 3, 2018 <br /> Page 8 <br /> ly considers the value of that space and does something that is less than the <br /> $595,000 but more than$55,000. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed with everything being said and thought it would <br /> be very transparent to have the column in the spreadsheet. <br /> Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment, with no one coming for- <br /> ward. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated when the preliminary budget and levy were set <br /> earlier in the year, there was discussion about reducing the reliance on reserves. <br /> The Council talked about doing it over a three-year or two-year period and at that <br /> time, she made it clear she was in favor of doing it over three years and this item <br /> is reflecting and built using a two-year period. She wondered if anyone else on <br /> the Council wanted to discuss this further. <br /> Mayor Roe believed the levy amount includes approximately $113,800 to account <br /> for doing it in two years versus three years. If the City were to go to the three- <br /> year approach, the levy could go down theoretically by the $113,800. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated he did bring that forward and the reason why he <br /> pushed for that is the City was looking to be trending toward the 35% bottom of <br /> what the City wanted for reserves. There is now a projection putting the City <br /> $200,000 below that amount in 2018. Even if the City hits the rosiest of projec- <br /> tions of doing better than that, the City will end up at about $100,000 above the <br /> 35% but are projected to use an additional $340,000 of reserves in the budget for <br /> next year. The City will then end up approximately $240,000 in the hole. He <br /> could not imagine making that deficit worse by decreasing the levy. The City <br /> Council needs to take the steps needed in order to not rely on using the reserves in <br /> the General Fund that the City does not have much funds. He would prefer to <br /> have the two-year plan that is in place because it puts the City closer to budgeting <br /> evenly instead of relying on reserves that the City is running out of <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Etten. She thought it <br /> was very important that the City get out of this hole and the pattern of using re- <br /> serve funds to balance the operating budget. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated with respect to the conversation, he thought the <br /> entire Council was in the agreement of stepping back and weaning the City of use <br /> of reserves for ongoing operational expenses and he thought the Council was all <br /> in agreement with that is the direction the City should go. He was interested in <br /> pursuing the three-year option with respect to all of the other things going on the <br /> City is doing with utility rates, what the Council is seeing elsewhere in the Com- <br /> munity, and impacts that are being felt with other agencies as well. Something <br /> that is very important to him as the Council goes forward is to have a better un- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.