My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes_2014_August
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
Minutes_2014_August
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 11:19:31 AM
Creation date
1/14/2019 11:17:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance Commission Minutes <br />August 21, 2014 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />require a large capital expenditure or investment and if these are planned for then the City would <br />have the funds available. <br />Chair Schroeder explained that having so many different funds could create confusion with <br />residents and one of the goals of the Finance Commission was to create transparency and clear <br />communication with residents. <br />Finance Director Miller explained the decision for what funds to display can be flexible <br />depending on how much money is specifically earmarked in the fund. The ones that are seen in <br />the financial statements have been segregated to be sure they have more transparency than it <br />would if all the funds were combined into one. <br />Chair Schroeder suggested the City could still have the different funds but then roll it together <br />into one report that would be easier for people to read. <br />Finance Director Miller explained the City maintains approximately 100 different funds and <br />these are rolled up into the 15 that are shown in the financial reports. These remaining funds <br />could be combined but the City does work to adhere to the Generally Accepted Standards of <br />Financial Reporting for Local Governments. <br />Chair Schroeder stated one of the things she has for the Commission to look at is formatting of <br />documents for the public. There is a difference between what the City would need for things <br />such as bonding but there is also a format that the average resident would find usable. In order <br />for the Commission to engage the residents, the Commission would need to find a way to <br />communicate with them. She asked if the Commission was comfortable with the goals that the <br />Reserve Policy established for these funds. <br />Vice Chair Rohloff asked if the Commission should recommend to the Council adding language <br />to the Reserve Policy that addresses the funds that are over the goal amounts established in the <br />policy. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber asked if the balances in the funds were to be maintained at goal <br />throughout the year or just at the end of the year. He also asked how high or low the funds were <br />throughout the year. He stated the funds could drop below the goal level quickly if there was a <br />down turn in the economy. <br />Finance Director Miller stated the intent of the Reserve Policy is that the fund is measured at the <br />end of the fiscal year. One of the main reasons for having reserves is to provide cash flow in- <br />between revenue collection periods. The main source of revenue for the City is property taxes <br />and these are collected in May and December. The Reserve Policy states the fund is measured at <br />the end of the Fiscal year, which is December 31 and that is also when the fund has just received <br />a large cash deposit. The City then uses these funds for the next six months until the next large <br />influx occurs and it is not unusual for the Reserve Fund to get down to 5%. The cash flow needs <br />of each fund have been analyzed to determine the appropriate goals for each fund. He stated the <br />City Council wanted the Finance Commission to review the context of the Cash Reserve Policies <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.