My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes_2014_August
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
Minutes_2014_August
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 11:19:31 AM
Creation date
1/14/2019 11:17:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance Commission Minutes <br />August 21, 2014 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />to determine if these are sound financial policies based on the City's cash flow needs and <br />recommend what to do when there is excess in these funds. <br />Commissioner Hodder stated on page 4 of the July 8 memo, Overview of Cash Reserve Policies, <br />the projections show a significant drop in reserves from 2014 to 2018 if nothing is done. <br />Finance Director Miller stated this particular chart is referring to the Capital Reserves not the <br />Operating Reserves. <br />Chair Schroeder stated the Commission would get an update of the Capital Reserve Funds at <br />their next meeting. <br />Vice Chair Rohloff stated the Commission should recommend a policy to the Council for what <br />should be done when the reserves are above the targeted goal. He suggested either having the <br />funds transferred or spent down to reduce the levy. He stated if the City does want to have large <br />reserves in a particular fund then the Council could increase the goal amount for that particular <br />fund. <br />Chair Schroeder clarified if the money was over the goal the Council could look at other funds <br />and if there were funds that were lacking, the excess funds could be transferred there or they <br />could use it to offset a levy increase. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated the Council might not want to mandate or set in policy what to <br />do when the funds exceed the goals. He also stated he did not agree with moving the money into <br />funds that are low because this will interfere with the historical accounting of the funds. If the <br />Licensing Center would like to build a new facility, then the City could look at a bond similar to <br />other projects versus building up cash reserves. <br />Chair Schroeder stated if the Licensing Center was saving money for a new facility, these funds <br />should be in the Capital Funds not in the Operating Funds. The Council is asking for a <br />recommendation from the Commission regarding the Cash Reserve Policy. She stated she is <br />comfortable with the goals established in the policy for the different funds and the Policy should <br />include the Council having the opportunity or option to move these excess funds to use towards <br />the levy. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated the goals of the funds should be based on the cash flow needs <br />for each particular fund and this should not be continually changed for special needs or projects. <br />Vice Chair Rohloff stated the City Council has the option to change the fund goals as they feel <br />necessary and this should be included in the Policy. The Policy states the budget shall be <br />prepared on an all resources basis. This is stating the budget is reviewed as a whole and not each <br />individual fund so the transfer of funds between them to accommodate needs in other funds <br />should be a recommendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.