res_11568 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota,was held on the 7th day of January 2019 at 6:00p.m. The following Council Members were present: Willmus, Groff,Etten,Laliberte and Roe and none were absent:.none. Council Member Etten introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 11568 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION VARIANCE AND SIMONSEN ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT (PF18-022) WHEREAS, Kevin Arndt has submitted a valid application on behalf of the property owner, Maria Simonsen, for approval of a proposed subdivision variance and Simonsen Estates preliminary plat of the residential property at 2600 Hamline Avenue; and WHEREAS,the property included in the proposed Simonsen Etstates plat is assigned Ramsey County Parcel Identification Number 10-29-23-12-0035, and is legally described as: The West 291 feet of the North 108.9 feet of the South 258.9 feet of the North Quarter of the Northeast Quarter Southwest of Section 10, Township 29, Range 23. WHEREAS the proposed subdivision conforms to all of the applicable standards of the City of Roseville zoning and subdivision codes, except for the substandard depth of the proposed Lot 2,which must be resolved by the approval of a subdivision variance;and WHEREAS,the Roseville Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing for this application on December 5, 2018, and having closed said public hearing, voted to recommend approval of the proposed subdivision variance and preliminary plat based on the public record and the Planning Commission's deliberation with the condition that 16.5 feet of additional Hamline Avenue right-of-way be dedicated pursuant to Ramsey County's Major Street Plan; and WHEREAS the Roseville City Council has made the following findings with respect to the proposed subdivision variance as mandated by §1102.02.0 of the Roseville City Code: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan because it represents the Comprehensive Plan's goals of residential reinvestment. 2. The proposal is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning and subdivision ordinances. The proposal is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning and subdivision ordinances as they apply to such lot splits because the goals of these ordinances are to ensure that new lots have simple, regular shapes with enough area to be appropriate and suitable for residential development, and the proposed rectangular lots are largerthan most of their neighbors despite the substandard depth of Lot 2. 3. An unusual hardship on the land exists. The subject property far exceeds the minimum size requirements for a corner parcel, and but for a deviation of 1% from the minimum required Page 1 of 3