My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_01-22_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2019
>
2019_01-22_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 2:04:30 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 1:56:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/22/2019
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
j. The department staffing, equipment and storage needs have expanded faster than the building additions. <br />Each addition adds less and detracts more from the existing building layout. <br />k. Keep putting money into existing building and site that doesn't meet the Department's long-term needs <br />Ed Kotler reviewed benefits of new site or new building <br />a. In the long term, a new building could accommodate the Public Works and parks & Rec. Department needs <br />with efficient operations, improved safety, modem equipment, and plans for expansion. <br />Is. New building on new site or purchase and reconfigure an existing building on a new site <br />c. New site could provide adequate yard storage <br />d. New building could consolidate all Parks & Rec. vehicles, storage & workshop so department isn't split <br />e. New site/budding requires long term vision; in the meantime the city is leasing space <br />The Public Works and Parks & Rec. Departments like a centrally located facility within Roseville. <br />Action Items <br />a. (Stew) will review equipment depicted on Me off site storage facility and send Kodet an updated list. <br />Is. (Mar) to assist Kodet in identifying programmatic challenges of Me current facility <br />c. Kodet to refine programming Report and explore all feasible design options onsite wiM a basic <br />outline of fire laenefits of a new site <br />d. Design options to be pursued include: <br />it Scheme A (AlA AS A1.1): MerraNne additions and new off site storage facility <br />B) Scheme B (AZA AS AZA): SW Addition and mezzaNnes w/ smaller off site storage facility <br />iii) Scheme C: West Addition and mezzaNnes, move Civic Center Drive <br />Pat Scheme D: Combined Addition of Scheme B AS C, move Civic Center Drive <br />v) Scheme E(AM,A32,AO.la,AO.1b,A0.lc, AO.ld): New building on new site <br />Next Meeting: TBD (approx. two weeks) <br />ad of meeting miwtes. <br />The aboved asummary ofMeifans dlscuasedlndlsfing deasioosregasumhaepmject Itismtm alto be Ntallyiotlnvve Normal iofapre ioosand <br />mramoq as part of professional services, can and poll charge Me de a gn Suchiotupatatloos and cmrdmaional be consistent par the overall <br />directi on ondhistory of Me project Plesemnew and respond ver, any changes, northers or davficanons vi um five evetldng days <br />Submitted By <br />KODET ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, LTD. <br />Cc. All Attendees <br />Kotler File <br />07291026176_ rosevillemaint_mm.ducx 0 <br />� ©2017 Kodet Arch itectu ra l Grou p Ltd. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.