Laserfiche WebLink
218 <br />Member Kors stated he did take a class in Complete Streets and one of the aspects <br />219 <br />he didn't see in this that was discussed in workshop was the direction in terms of <br />220 <br />what the final goal is. He did not see a direction with this, it is just the facts. He <br />221 <br />wondered if there was a goal. He did not see anything in the checklist for speed. <br />222 <br />He wondered if some boxes could also be put in the desirable list. He stated he was <br />223 <br />trying to think out of the box. <br />224 <br />225 <br />Mr. Culver thought there might be a supplementary document with a survey or <br />226 <br />checklist for the users to fill out and let the City know what the objectives are for <br />227 <br />the project from the user's side. He thought there c d be an open box for public <br />228 <br />objectives or stakeholder objectives or goals. <br />229 <br />230 <br />Chair Cihacek thought the set of goals would be defined through the authorization <br />231 <br />of the project so he thought when the project is started there will also be a reason <br />232 <br />why it is being done in order to request the funding or other things. He did not <br />233 <br />think a goal needed to be defined because it will be defined elsewhere through some <br />234 <br />other process. He did think it might be nice to tie it all together somewhere into the <br />235 <br />document sets. He thought that would be important. He noted of the goals <br />236 <br />are defined through other licies. The City already has a set of go m a policy <br />237 <br />perspective that will nee chieved through this process. <br />238 <br />What <br />239 <br />Member Kors asked if there s a g in this would recognize a unique <br />240 <br />feature forRos 'lle, more goal orientated. <br />241 <br />242 <br />Mr. Frei mer thought that would be included in the checklist and will account <br />243 <br />for unique elements. <br />244 <br />245 Chair Cihacek stated the checklist is not the design document. This is the initial <br />246 characteristic of the project the City is going to be doing and part of the planning <br />247 process, not a part of the design process. <br />248 4 <br />249 Mr Culver stated he s complete streets policy helps with design. He <br />250 rev d with the Commissi he process staff goes through for a project. He <br />251 state thought this existing characteristic is the technical first look at identifying <br />252 some of the ey features and deficiencies that are in the corridor and presenting to <br />253 the public. <br />254 <br />255 Chair Cihacek t ght the documents defined the flow. He stated he did not have <br />256 any concerns, and this was a good starting place. <br />257 <br />258 Member Kruse asked if Ramsey County had a policy. <br />259 <br />260 Mr. Culver did not know if Ramsey County had a formal Complete Streets Policy. <br />261 Ramsey County has a newer initiative that has been embraced holistically <br />262 throughout the organization as far as access for all abilities. He did not know if <br />263 Ramsey County had a formal Complete Streets Policy. <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />