My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0128
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 10:08:49 AM
Creation date
2/13/2019 10:08:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/28/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 28, 2019 <br /> Page 14 <br /> course correction the City will have to make with the street replacement program <br /> down the road will probably need a greater infusion of cash than if the money is <br /> taken from somewhere else. He noted the funds in the street replacement program <br /> stands out and is the fund that has the most available reserves but there are <br /> tradeoffs. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked how much interest the City is making on the street <br /> replacement fund. <br /> Mr. Miller stated the fund is not making a lot in interest, approximately two per- <br /> cent, $160,000 annually. If the money was taken from that fund, the City would <br /> lose$40,000 of interest annually. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated the Gaughan Companies have a two-year window to <br /> look at developing the Fairview site as a part of this agreement and he wondered <br /> when that timeframe ends. <br /> Mr. Miller thought the City still had a year from April. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon had hoped the Gaughan Companies would have been at the EDA <br /> meeting tonight to talk about some of their plans and requests to assist but the <br /> Gaughan Companies could not get all of the information together in time. He <br /> suspected in February, the City will see a proposal from them. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated in regard to the license center, the $120,000 the <br /> City added was leasehold savings for current year and the lease that was in place <br /> was going to increase by three percent per year. He asked if Mr. Miller was ac- <br /> counting for that number going forward as increasing three percent per year. <br /> Mr. Miller'assumed that would be the case moving forward but it is always under <br /> the assumption the City would have the monies to do that. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated he was not interested in going out and issuing <br /> bonds. The only scenario where he would have been is if the City was looking at <br /> revenue bonds and he was not sure the City was going there. He thought the City <br /> was looking to fund it internally and certainly looking to utilize some excess rev- <br /> enues from the license center to help offset the payback of where funds are bor- <br /> rowed from. He noted the Fairview site will be sold at some point and utilizing <br /> the dollars as well. Long term, he did not go into this acquiring this center for a <br /> license center and for him, it was a much bigger picture with regard to acquisition <br /> of the land adjacent to City Hall. The Council has had some discussion on what <br /> the City needs for space and storage, etc., coming up in the future and at some <br /> point, he saw a very strong Public Works role over there and that all enters into <br /> this conversation at some point as well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.