My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_0318_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2019
>
2019_0318_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 1:50:04 PM
Creation date
4/4/2019 12:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/8/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Finance Director Millerstated this chart gives the transparency of where the excess reserves <br />came from. Cities have gone to great lengths never tohave a pile of money sitting aside with an <br />undecided future. That used to happen all the time, and there was fair amount of criticism from <br />the public. <br />The Commission discussed the best way to display the cash reserves. It was also noted that there <br />is a relationship between the CIP and the cash reserves. <br />It was suggested by Chair Schroeder that when the money is earmarked for something like the <br />License Center, it should not be a cash reserve fund; it should be in a CIP. It is easier to tell the <br />public that this money is in the CIP fund than it is just sitting there in the cash reserves. <br />Commissioner McRoberts stated it is important to have the cash reserves split out to help the <br />Council and public see where those funds are coming from. <br />Commissioner Zeller noted he has tried, since the last meeting, to put some scenarios together to <br />see how this would work. He noted this policy does not address the deficit side of things, which <br />happens almost as frequently as surpluses. In addition, the FC has recommended a policy to deal <br />with excess amounts in the budgets. He recommended rejection of the proposal as it has been <br />presented, to create a single cash reserve fund. <br />Commissioner Zeller moved to REJECT the future initiatives funding program as presented by <br />the City, put together by staff and dated on July 12, 2017, and recommend sticking with the <br />current operating and fund reserve policy. <br />Finance Director Miller noted the Council’s direction was not to comment on staff’s proposal but <br />rather to comment on the creation of a cash carry-forward policy and process. Staff had already <br />given its recommendation as a separate aside. The Council wants to know if what is <br />contemplated on page 2 of the staff report is a good idea. <br />Commissioner Zeller withdrew his motion. <br />Commissioner Zeller emphasized that any policy needs to address a deficit. <br />Chair Schroeder noted she did not support the policy put forward by the staff. Most of the <br />Commission had come to that conclusion, she recalled. <br />Chair Schroeder commented if capital cannot be removed from the operation funds, then cash <br />carry-forward does not work. <br />Finance Director Miller noted that removing the capital is possible. The first two do not have <br />capital, but the last three do. There is a mechanism to remove the capital; that is easy, as shown <br />in the flow chart. The question is whether to sweep what is left over into a single fund. That is <br />the remaining question. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.