Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment B <br />Commissioner McRoberts asked if the question boils down to whether the surplus stays in one <br />budget or it if stays in five buckets. <br />Chair Schroeder questioned whether it is easy to remove the capital. <br />Finance Director Miller responded that when the money is removed, right now, all of this cash is <br />discretely presented in the financial statements. That is already there. He explained the capital <br />will get blended with other funds. Separate CIP funds can be created, but there is no good <br />mechanism to display every separated fund in the financial statements.The financial statement <br />would get quite large. <br />The Commission suggested having a discretely presented License Center capital fund and <br />another discretely presented License Center operating fund. This will get to better transparency <br />for citizens. <br />Finance Director Miller noted the general fund and Parks and Rec funds also have capital funds; <br />they are just not discretely presented. <br />The Commission discussed pulling out the License Center, to display operations and capital; <br />also, how to separate the operating funds from the CIP. <br />Finance Director Miller noted there are generally accepted accounting principles, which staff <br />will continue to follow; but moving the capital out from the operating and still showing the <br />reserve funds is easy to do. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber commented the cash reserve fund is there to provide insurance for <br />departments. It is unnecessary to provide insurance on 5 funds at a premium when it can be <br />provided across all funds at once. It costs the City less on unused capital when it is done across <br />the board. This does not reduce anyone’s budget. <br />It was discussed what would happen if there is a deficit. It was suggested that the City should <br />budget for increasing the cash reserve fund the year it is needed. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber moved, seconded by Commissioner Murray, to propose that the <br />Council adopt the strategy that cash reserve policy should be one where the City removes the <br />capital funds, creating CIP funds for those accounts, and sweeping any excess. Once all those <br />funds are at least at a minimum, any excess would go into a centralized account which the <br />Council would be expected to take action on, whether that is for to help shore up CIP deficits or <br />for tax relief or for any other purpose. Those amounts would not just sit in cash reserve funds. <br />Commission Discussion <br />Commissioner Zeller expressed concern about the last box on the flowchart. He would like to <br />see a little more framework around a specific recommendation. Something to provide guidance <br />would be a prudent thing to do, and he would not support a motion without those parameters. <br /> <br />