My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_0318_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2019
>
2019_0318_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 1:50:04 PM
Creation date
4/4/2019 12:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/8/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Chair Schroeder suggested the motion be modified to indicate this concept can be presented to <br />the Council and the FC could then look at it again and add more details. If the Commission puts <br />a lot of time into it, and the Council does not like it, then it would return to square one. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber added this may allow the City to have smaller cash reserve targets. <br />And if the CIP is pulled out, it is no longer masking the amount of excess that exists within those <br />funds. This makes it clear what is needed and it is called out what is extra. There is no need to <br />be more specific right now. He indicated he is comfortable in proposing this to the Council and <br />receive feedback from them. Further, he is not inclined to put much more effort into it, without <br />knowing of the Council’s support. <br />Commissioner McRoberts concurred there is a philosophical discussion to be had first, among <br />the Council. <br />Commissioner Zeller stated as a concept to move forward, he will support the motion. <br />Chair Schroeder summarized that the motion calls for page 2 of the staff report as the proposal, <br />th <br />with the addition on the 4 box of ensuring that no individual box is less than its minimum <br />target. <br />Finance Director Miller asked for clarification on the term “excess” cash reserve targets. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber clarified it should be excess of the target amount. Everything above <br />the midpoint, while ensuring all of the funds are above the minimum. This is a proposed policy, <br />for the Council to consider. <br />Commissioner Harold commented that the midpoint would then effectively become the new <br />maximum, if a fund is never allowed to grow above that midpoint. <br />Finance Director Miller noted the target reserve levels are reviewed annually. <br />Commission Bachhuber amended the motion, and Commissioner Murray accepted the <br />amendment, to clarifythat the City would sweep anything in excess of the maximum of the <br />target reserve levels for each fund, ensuring each fund has its minimum amount. The City will <br />review the maximum and minimum of those funds. <br />The amended motion carried unanimously. <br />Chair Schroeder stated she would like to see the numbers with capital taken out. <br />Member McRoberts asked how the Communications fund is funded. Finance Director Miller <br />noted the funding comes through franchise fees. There are more expenditures than revenues, in <br />the 2017/2018 budget. A course correction will be needed at some point. The expenditures will <br />have to be adjusted. The franchise fees being taken in are already at the maximumallowed by <br />State law. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.