My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_04-23_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2019
>
2019_04-23_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2019 12:11:48 PM
Creation date
4/19/2019 12:10:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/23/2019
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
352 <br />353 Mr. Culver reviewed different sensors and timers available and what is required. <br />354 <br />355 Acting Chair Wozniak stated another option would be to change the rate structure <br />356 to charge more for irrigation than what would be charged for regular usage. <br />357 <br />358 Mr. Freihammer stated that was correct. <br />359 <br />360 Mr. Culver stated the only issue with that is reaching some sort of compromise <br />361 because the vast majority of the City's irrigation users do not have an irrigation <br />362 meter, so staff is guessing how much water the user is using for irrigation. <br />363 <br />364 Member Kruse stated if the irrigation rate is higher then there would not be any <br />365 incentive for people to get an irrigation meter. <br />366 <br />367 Mr. Culver stated that was correct unless there was some other threshold where the <br />368 rate would be higher without the meter. <br />369 <br />370 Member Misra stated the Commission is thinking like residential users because the <br />371 discussion has been about irrigation as the main use of water which is probably true <br />372 in a lot of cases but for the commercial users who are true industrial users their <br />373 water use is probably based on something else and in that case the incentive might <br />374 be finding ways to recycle water as an example, she did not know if the City can <br />375 prescribe that for all users or that the City can anticipate for commercial users to <br />376 looking at irrigation as the answer. She thought it was when looking at residential <br />377 users but when looking at commercial users it is very different and will be very <br />378 hard to figure out. Another thought is she still felt a resident in Roseville is a <br />379 resident whether the person lives an apartment or a condo or a house and she did <br />380 not think the resident should have to pay the highest rates in the City because the <br />381 person happens to be renting or living in a multi -unit dwelling. She thought <br />382 somehow the City needs to distinguish the commercial accounts from residential <br />383 based accounts within the commercial segment in the City and those residents get <br />384 charged on a residential scale rather than a commercial scale. She thought the City <br />385 should also keep the Summer Tiered rate for those residents. The remainder of the <br />386 commercial accounts, she did not know if installing an irrigation meter was <br />387 sensible. <br />388 <br />389 Acting Chair Wozniak thought it might be sensible for some which is why if he <br />390 were to suggest it, he wouldn't make it a mandate, he would make it an option for <br />391 commercial accounts. <br />392 <br />393 Mr. Freihammer indicated it already was an option and probably why the <br />394 commercial businesses that have one have done it already because those businesses <br />395 are irrigating so much and want the charge off their sewer bill. <br />396 <br />Page 9 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.