Laserfiche WebLink
306 Mr. Freihammer stated the slide is missing the Winter consumption so if looking at <br />307 the averages, Summer average is the Summer Consumption divided by the number <br />308 of units so the winter average would be the Winter Consumption divided by the <br />309 number of units. He indicated he must have hidden a column on the slide. <br />310 <br />311 Member Misra stated Mr. Freihammer indicated there was another city that was <br />312 considering a different scale for residential/commercial. <br />313 <br />314 Mr. Freihammer stated there was another city that defined it differently. The city <br />315 had some general commercial with apartments and senior housing. The fee <br />316 schedule had multiple rates and uses. That is not typical but certainly an option. <br />317 <br />318 Member Misra stated she was puzzled why the City would want to consider multi- <br />319 resident buildings as commercial. At least in the summer the single-family homes <br />320 are using more than the average commercial user including multi -family overall. <br />321 <br />322 Mr. Culver stated this is tricky when comparing all of commercial rates to single <br />323 family rates because there is a wide variety just within the multi -family residential. <br />324 If the Commission were to look at all of the commercial uses out there, there is an <br />325 extreme variety of water use versus residential. <br />326 <br />327 Member Misra thought it doesn't make sense to her to pass the commercial rate on <br />328 to a family in an apartment or a senior living situation. It feels a little unfair, <br />329 especially given that there might not be much irrigation done in the summer months <br />330 and if anything, there may be more conservation prone situation. <br />331 <br />332 Mr. Culver stated as a recommendation, something that could be easier to <br />333 implement from a City Code perspective or a policy perspective is for these multi- <br />334 family residential buildings, if irrigating and have a separate irrigation meter the <br />335 City would move the building off the Commercial rate but will not move the <br />336 building off the Commercial rate until a separate irrigation meter is installed. That <br />337 way the City can track the two differently. <br />338 <br />339 Acting Chair Wozniak thought the entire Commission could support the idea of <br />340 drawing more attention to water usage for non -essential items, such as pools, water <br />341 related activities and even irrigation as opposed to something related to food <br />342 preparation or hygiene. It seems to him that offering the option for commercial <br />343 users to install an irrigation meter that will be billed at a higher rate than regular <br />344 water usage but will reduce the sewer charges is one way to do that and as part of <br />345 that maybe look at the multi -unit buildings and offer that option to the landlords as <br />346 well. He thought those could be a couple of ideas for changes to recommend to the <br />347 water rates which he thought was the City goal was, to decide whether or not if the <br />348 rates are fine the way it is or if there are some tweaks the City can make to them to <br />349 encourage water conservation. <br />350 <br />351 Member Joyce thought the timers or sensors would be a great benefit. <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />