My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0415
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2019 2:55:42 PM
Creation date
5/7/2019 2:55:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/15/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 15, 2019 <br /> Page 8 <br /> age and stored vehicle part would be definitely troublesome and maybe the City <br /> would want to look at adding some additional definition under inoperable that <br /> might cover some of those other scenarios. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated unauthorized vehicle comes into play at a point in <br /> time where the vehicle has been found in violation of current City Code or Stat- <br /> ute. <br /> City Attorney Gaughan indicated that was correct. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated if the unauthorized vehicle, lines 75-77, stayed <br /> then her question was whether the last sentence refers to the stored vehicle which <br /> might not stay. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that part would have to be stricken. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated the City Attorney noted in some of his comments <br /> with regard to a vehicle being used as a portable storage unit that the City could <br /> look at a potential car cover. He did not know if that was the solution either and <br /> not necessarily a direction he would want to pursue. <br /> The City Council agreed. <br /> Mayor Roe thought the direction was to remove the portable storage unit defini- <br /> tion, unless it is relevant to other enforcement on properties related to those <br /> things. <br /> Mr. Englund stated that is the definition in the Zoning Code. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was anything in the Nuisance Code related to those be- <br /> ing a nuisance in any way. <br /> Mr. Englund stated only if those units are on the property in excess of thirty days, <br /> which the Zoning Code then reverts it back to the Nuisance Code. <br /> Mayor Roe thought it was okay to leave the definition in as long as any reference <br /> to it being a vehicle is pulled. He reiterated the council direction that the stored <br /> vehicle wording would come out and the reference to a stored vehicle unauthor- <br /> ized vehicle and to look at the inoperable condition definition to enhance the abil- <br /> ity to be driven safely because of"stuff." <br /> Community Development Director Janice Gundlach stated she reviewed the vari- <br /> ance section of the nuisance code, and the language was a bit confusing to her. <br /> The term `variance' has a very strict meaning in the Zoning Code that requires a <br /> Public Hearing, notification to the neighbors, and is defined in Statute. She noted <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.