My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-03-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
2019-03-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2019 11:01:32 AM
Creation date
5/9/2019 11:01:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/26/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Acting Chair Wozniak stated Member Misra's idea to move multi -unit families <br />from commercial to residential rates, but he was not sure if Member Misra was <br />suggesting installing an irrigation meter as part of that or would that be an incentive <br />for them to move over to the residential rate. <br />Member Misra thought that option was there. <br />Acting Chair Wozniak stated the option is there, but it could also be made a <br />requirement to install an irrigation meter if moving to residential rates. He <br />wondered if the Commission was close to making some recommendations about <br />rates or does the Commission need another meeting to talk about this with other <br />members. <br />Member Joyce thought more members should give their input. <br />Mr. Culver suggested maybe the Commission should hire a consultant who has a <br />lot of expertise in setting water rates. He noted other cities have done this. The <br />consultant could come back with recommendations and what has been done <br />effectively in other communities nationally. He indicated he did not know what the <br />cost of the study would be, there is not anything in budget for this, but it could be <br />looked at to see about budgeting for it and recommending to the City Council. That <br />could potentially be a much more intense approach. <br />Member Misra thought the Commission had a pretty good idea of Roseville and <br />what it is as a community. She stated Roseville is mostly residential and a lot of <br />the commercial is not highly industrial. Where she was having trouble is that it was <br />pretty easy to figure out the tiers for the residential usage but does not feel as clear <br />to figure it out for the commercial usage. She guessed if the City took all of the <br />residential water use out of commercial and look at what is left, it is probably a <br />pretty small number of users that use a lot of water either for irrigation or whatever <br />the industrial use is. One of the things the City could do is once all of the residential <br />users are taken out, increase the tiered rate, not by adding tiers but by going from <br />295 and 315 to 315 and 325 for example. Then the City is not looking at residential <br />use and she thought it was fair to say that people who are using water as a source <br />for promoting their business have a reason to pay for it in a different way. <br />Acting Chair Wozniak asked staff if that made sense and something the City could <br />do. He stated in terms of making multi -units a residence, he would be interested in <br />making that decision based on more than four randomly selected examples out of <br />the hundred or so the City has. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated staff could come back with some language to define the <br />properties as something different and try to look a little more at the data. <br />Page 11 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.