My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0506
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 9:51:30 AM
Creation date
5/22/2019 9:51:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/6/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 6, 2019 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Nays: None. <br /> c. Consideration of Ordinances Amending the City Code and Centre Pointe <br /> Planned Unit Development No. 1177 (PROJ43) <br /> Community Development Director Janice Gundlach briefly highlighted this item <br /> as detailed in the RCA and related attachments dated May 6, 2019. <br /> Mayor Roe stated he was looking at the existing Zoning Code in some of the oth- <br /> er Commercial Districts and it appears that the Health Club Fitness Center is <br /> largely permitted in the Commercial Districts, except that it is Conditional in the <br /> Neighborhood Business Districts. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted under the definition for Laboratory or Research De- <br /> velopment or Testing the strikeout portion on the first part of that on page 3 of 4 <br /> of the RCA, lines 53-57, the middle of 53 "...development or controlled produc- <br /> tion of high technology electronic, industrial, or scientific products or commodi- <br /> ties for sale..." that part has been taken out which very much changes the defini- <br /> tion. He did not know if staff was intending to pull out that limited production <br /> piece or not. <br /> Ms. Gundlach stated she did not know the origination of why certain language <br /> was stricken from this definition and how this new definition materialized. She <br /> stated if the Council wanted to keep some of that existing language, staff can do <br /> that and provide some follow up at the next meeting. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated he would be open to Council discussion on this. He <br /> did not mind and understood some of the purpose of the new wording including <br /> the last portion of the sentence. If he were revising this, he would put the word <br /> "development" back into the list of"equipped for medical, scientific, or techno- <br /> logical research, experiments, and/or testing..." and then he would add in the sec- <br /> ond sentence that takes in that production piece. A second sentence would start <br /> "these may include controlled production of high technology electronic, industri- <br /> al, or scientific products or commodities for sale." <br /> Councilmember Etten stated his concern is that by eliminating some of the differ- <br /> ent Med-Tech companies that are certainly populating the area and not allowing <br /> some of that limited production might create a problem for a high-quality compa- <br /> ny that would not have impacts on the neighborhood but would have impacts on <br /> what could be done there. <br /> Mayor Roe questioned from his perspective, do experiments and testing cover the <br /> type of limited production the City is talking about? His concern is, he thought the <br /> City wanted to be unambiguous about what sort of production might be allowed. <br /> Also, elsewhere in the City Code some of the definitions regarding limited pro- <br /> duction as a use that is allowed in certain Districts. He thought the intention is that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.