My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0506
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 9:51:30 AM
Creation date
5/22/2019 9:51:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/6/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 6, 2019 <br /> Page 13 <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed that listing off a couple of pieces of medical seems <br /> unusual and it was fine with Clinic, Medical, Dental or Optical as that was clear. <br /> He appreciated the note of the separate line of limited production and processing. <br /> He stated he would not support the adding back of college or post-secondary <br /> school office space as per the Council's previous direction on this. It was even <br /> noted in the minutes of the Planning Commission that the Commission knows <br /> where the Council stands on this item. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated she supported it then and supports it now. <br /> Councilmember Willmus concurred with Councilmember Etten. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred with Councilmember Laliberte. <br /> Councilmember Groff stated he read through all of the minutes and the arguments <br /> on both sides and would concur with Councilmember Willmus' logic on that be- <br /> fore and currently and would not support that. <br /> Councilmember Groff asked when talking about health club fitness centers, those <br /> are allowed in these spaces with a Conditional Use Permit and is that how those <br /> are used right now. <br /> Mayor Roe stated he reviewed this before and the only District where this is not <br /> permitted is Neighborhood Business, but he thought the Council had Legislative <br /> discretion to decide whether the City has a different standard in this Planned Unit <br /> Development and it is up to the Council to decide. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated he would like to see it remain a Conditional Use <br /> within this PUD, understanding the intent for identifying this and calling for spe- <br /> cial categorization of this particular area. <br /> Councilmember Groff stated the concern he would have, is with a very different <br /> use than the others because of the times those businesses are open and also with <br /> the traffic pattern being different. He thought it was something to be considered <br /> as a Council. <br /> Mayor Roe agreed. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated from his perspective he would like to see it re- <br /> main as a Conditional Use or remove it. If it is a Conditional Use it is going <br /> through a process that is reviewed by both the Planning Commission and City <br /> Council. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was support for removing it altogether as a use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.