CC_Minutes_2019_0513 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, May 13, 2019 Page 10 could, as a condition of approval, but could as a habit of making that a condition on every drive through CUP the Council looks at. Mr. Paschke stated the intensification aspect might be a little more difficult to monitor and measure. Councilmember Etten stated to him, any of this would apply to anywhere in the City. He asked if staff wanted to create a separate condition. Mr. Paschke stated currently it would. Mayor Roe asked whether staff would actually make that circulation plan a part of the specific approved Conditional Use for that site. Ms. Gundlach confirmed that was correct and included attaching a specific site plan to that use. She stated the City already has the regular condition in the CU language. Councilmember Willmus stated when the site plan changes the conditional use comes back. Mr. Paschke stated or if the site plan changes too dramatically it would come back. Councilmember Etten supported that. Ms. Gundlach reported staff did add the language in the one condition, "sufficient to accommodate demands". Mayor Roe questioned if it made sense in the Ordinance to state "The circulation plan that demonstrates all that, which shall be made a part of the CU permit," more specific language that states the plan actually becomes a part of the Condi- tional Use approval so future councils and future Staff know that a plan just does not need to be submitted but rather the plan is part of the approval and it goes with the approval. Mr. Paschke stated that could be added and there will be other conditions that typ- ically become part of those approvals as well that are not really discussed either. Ms. Gundlach stated the nice thing about adding it to the Ordinance as well is that the users that are looking at the Ordinance before contacting staff are already put on notice that this is an expectation. Mayor Roe did not think there were any other questions or comments from the Council.