Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 17, 2019 <br /> Page 13 <br /> Commissioner Newby thought the initial goal behind the reporting was to enable <br /> citizens who were concerned about either deer eating in their garden or in some <br /> rare instances, aggressive deer at the park or were behaving in a threatening man- <br /> ner. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was clear direction from the Council to the Commission <br /> about handing off the decision making of this to the Commission and staff and re- <br /> porting back to the Council. <br /> Commissioner Stoner asked if there was any desire to provide the Commission <br /> any guidance on how quickly to get to the healthy herd goal. <br /> Mayor Roe stated there was no direct indication of a set time to get to the healthy <br /> herd goal. <br /> Commissioner Willmus thought that would be a discussion the Commission <br /> would have with Parks Director Brokke, based on recommendations from the <br /> DNR and USDA. <br /> Chair Baggenstoss noted another issue is the Emerald Ash Borer(EAB). <br /> Vice Chair Hoag reviewed with the Council the Emerald Ash Borer and potential <br /> funding options the Commission would like the Council to consider to help man- <br /> age the Emerald Ash Borer in the City. He stated the Commission recommended <br /> the City Council earmark some money to help fund the control of Emerald Ash <br /> Borer. <br /> Mayor Roe thought there was use of reserves and that part of the recommendation <br /> was additional levy funds as well, almost matching the reserve funds as well for a <br /> total of$1.3 million over that timeframe. <br /> Vice Chair Hoag agreed and noted each year for the first couple of years there is <br /> also a levy fund of$50,000 that jumps a little bit in year three to $84,000 and then <br /> back down to $50,000. Once 2025 comes, that is where the levy funds jump in <br /> this proposed approach. There are a couple of other ways to get there but being a <br /> little more aggressive may help the problem sooner rather than later. <br /> Mayor Roe stated part of it was to get at the cost. The removal cost is approxi- <br /> mately $725,000 over that time frame and the replacement cost is approximately <br /> $580,000 which is where the whole $1.3 million comes into play. He wanted to <br /> make sure that was all on the table and part of the discussion for the public as well <br /> as the Council. <br />