My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0617
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0617
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2019 3:21:43 PM
Creation date
7/9/2019 3:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/17/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 17, 2019 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Councilmember Groff agreed and thought the Commission was on the right page <br /> as far as what it is doing with the DNR and other agencies. He liked the idea of <br /> coming to the Council each year with a report of what is going on. <br /> Councilmember Etten appreciated that the Commission had a decision and moved <br /> beyond an exact number to talk about a healthy herd. He asked how the Commis- <br /> sion would identity that. <br /> Commissioner Newby explained there are a number of factors that go into a <br /> healthy herd. As part of the DNR and USDA surveys, winters are analyzed for <br /> deer that did not survive, body fat, and also takes into account the birth rate. A <br /> healthy doe will typically give birth to twin fawns. What was seen over the last <br /> few years is that the does reproducing were only giving birth to single fawns and <br /> some were not producing at all, which would suggest the herd was less than <br /> healthy. Also, there were some external indications the deer that were harvested <br /> as a result of reduction were sickly and less than healthy. There are a lot of fac- <br /> tors that go into what makes a healthy herd but generally there should be fewer, <br /> healthier deer than a lot of deer that are sick. There is a lot of calcullus that goes <br /> into it with the DNR but those are the primary factors. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated he appreciated those numbers and wondered if <br /> the Commission thought there was a reasonable low-end cap that maybe policy <br /> makers would set a low end and then within that, the Commission identifies based <br /> on DNR feedback. <br /> Commissioner Newby thought that would be the goal. What the Commission <br /> would recommend and what the Commission is trying to do is for the City to stick <br /> as close as possible to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources recom- <br /> mendation recognizing that there are a number of variables. He thought 15 to 19 <br /> should be the goal and should not necessarily be a hard and fast number. <br /> Mayor Roe thought the Council felt it made sense to allow that process to move <br /> forward. He thought the reality of it was that it might mean in the near-term years, <br /> there might be more than twenty taken in a given year to help move closer to that <br /> healthy population more quickly. But he thought in the out years, it might mean <br /> less and some years where nothing would be done. It all depends on how the <br /> population stabilizes. <br /> Commissioner Newby noted there are a lot of variables but there are a lot of <br /> things the City can do to keep it closer to the target goal. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked what the end goal would be for the City for citizens <br /> to report deer sightings in the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.