My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0722
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2019 11:24:29 AM
Creation date
8/13/2019 11:24:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/22/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular city Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 22, 2019 <br /> Page 12 <br /> also thought the Commission should research the timeline more to see if a band is <br /> needed based on the time of sunset and when the movie is shown. <br /> Councilmember Groff thought it would be a good idea for the Commission to <br /> reach out to the Spanish Immersion School. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested La Tapatia in Roseville as a sponsor because that restaurant <br /> also has a food truck and could donate the food truck. He thought this was a well <br /> thought out plan overall and he liked it. He thought the Council should make sure <br /> to be there as well and the plans should proceed with the budget laid out. <br /> Vice Chair Peterson thanked the Council for the feedback and indicated the <br /> Commission will work toward the next steps and report back to the Council <br /> quickly. <br /> d. Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Amending §1009.02.D.12c Drive- <br /> Through Facilities. <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the RCA <br /> and related attachments dated July 22, 2019. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated he read over the Commission discussion and <br /> appreciated their thoughts. He asked at what point would this need to be amended. <br /> Mr. Paschke thought one thing is the change in use from one proprietor that may- <br /> be received the conditional use approval to begin with to somebody who is com- <br /> ing in and working under it as an opportunity for staff to work with them. The <br /> business will have this information to let them know that these are the require- <br /> ments the City needs for the business to function under and the city will monitor <br /> the business and make certain that the drive through facility is able to achieve <br /> compliance. He thought the catch would be if the City received complaints or <br /> drove by and saw there were issues and concerns with that. Then the City would <br /> have the conversation with the business. <br /> Ms. Gundlach thought a lot of discussion at the Council level was not just with <br /> the initial user of the Conditional Use but the future users that get to come later on <br /> and use the Conditional Use that is already a part of the record. She thought the <br /> Council's concern with the last sentence staff added and to Councilmember Et- <br /> ten's question about it being amended from time to time. One example of that <br /> which comes to her mind every time is the language staff added "sufficient to ac- <br /> commodate demand." <br /> Councilmember Etten asked if staff felt there was sufficient information for the <br /> City to make accommodations and change that plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.