Res_11631 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 26th day of August 2019 at 6:00 p.m. The following Council Members were present: Willmus, Laliberte, Groff, Etten, and Roe; and none were absent. Council Member Etten introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 11631 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AS A CONDITIONAL USE ON LOT 1 OF THE FAIRVIEW AVENUE ADDITION PLAT (PF19-016) WHEREAS, Reuter Walton Development, LLC and TJL Development, LLC have submitted a valid application for approval of a proposed a multifamily residential development as a conditional use on Lot 1 of the Fairview Avenue Addition on behalf of the property owners, Pinecone Roseville, LLC and 2720 Fairview DFC, LLC; and WHEREAS, the property included in the proposed Fairview Avenue Addition plat is assigned Ramsey County Parcel Identification Number 04-29-23-43-0002, and is legally described as: The South 480 feet of the North 1926 feet of that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 23, lying West of the East 2075 feet thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS City Code §1009.02.0 establishes general standards and criteria that pertain to all conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing for the request on August 7, 2019, and having closed said public hearing, voted to recommend approval of the proposed multifamily residential development based on the public record and the Planning Commission's deliberation with certain conditions; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has made the following findings regarding the general standards and criteria established in §1009.02.C: 1. The proposed use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan does not specifically identify this site for residential development,but the proposal is generally not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan because: a. It represents the Comprehensive Plan's broad goals promoting high quality reinvestment. b. The description of the pertinent Community Mixed-Use land use category indicates that "[r]esidential land uses should generally represent between 25% and 50% of the overall mixed-use area."To date, only about 2.5% of the original Twin Lakes area includes residential development, and the current proposal would increase that to about 4%. c. Among the future land use issues discussed in Planning District 10, residential development is recognized as an important source of support for business development in Twin Lakes. Page 1 of 2