My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_1007_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2019
>
2019_1007_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2019 4:09:24 PM
Creation date
10/18/2019 4:08:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
10/7/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) Program Analysis –draft created 5/1/19 <br />Utilizing Excess Parks and Recreation Reserve Funds and Tax Levy <br />Possible Approach <br />Excess Annual Remove Replace Treat <br />Reserve Budget <br />Amount Allocation <br />2021 $150,000 $ 50,000 $135,000 $57,000 $8,000 <br />(330)(126) <br />2022 $150,000 $ 50,000 $135,000 $65,000 $0 <br />(330)(140) <br />2023 $150,000 $ 84,000 $169,000 $65,000 $0 <br />(420)(140) <br />2024 $150,000 $ 50,000 $120,000 $80,000 $0 <br />(300)(175) <br />2025 $ 34,968 $181,032$116,000 $100,000 $0 <br />(290)(185) <br />2026 $150,000$50,000 $ 100,000$0 <br />(125)(220) <br />2026-??? $112,000$112,000 $0 <br />(250???) <br />TOTALS $634,968 $677,032$725,000 $579,000 $8,000 <br />(1795)(1476) <br />General Notes/Comments: <br />There would be a substantial change to the landscape of the Roseville Urban Forest. <br />However, the above rough draft provides for a 5-6 year program (with residual in final <br />year) to substantially eradicate EAB on public property and maintain a reasonable canopy <br />throughout time. <br />This would be an unusual approach. If interested, we would want to begin immediately <br />and have closer conversations with potential tree contractors to assess feasibility of <br />magnitude, timing, procurement method and approach. <br />Propose Best Value Procurement Method <br />o Request for Proposals (RFP) would include solicitation of a single vendor that <br />could manage a multiyear contract to complete the job. <br />o This project would be similar to multiyear Natural Resources Restoration <br />Program –may also include grant option. <br />o Would be proposals and not a low bid. <br />o One contractor may manage multiple contracts, i.e. treat, remove and replace <br />City decision would need to be made with time to allow for thorough research, RFP and <br />selection process for any year prior to implementation i.e. if year is 2020 start, then <br />decision made by August/September of 2019. <br />This program would phase out treatment. <br />Average cost assumption = $400 to remove and $450 to replace. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.