Res_11644 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 21'day of October 2019 at 6:00 p.m. The following Council Members were present: Willmus, Groff, Etten, Laliberte,and Roe; none were absent. Council Member Willmus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 11644 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED MICROBREWERY AS A CONDITIONAL USE AT 2704 E SNELLING DRIVE (PF19-018) WHEREAS, High Pines Brewing Company LLC submitted a valid application for approval of a proposed microbrewery as a conditional use at 2704 E Snelling Drive on behalf of the property owner,The Starlite Limited Partnership; and WHEREAS, the property is assigned Ramsey County Parcel Identification Number 03-29-23-33- 0025, and is legally described as: Lot 5, Block 1, Venture 3rd Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, City Code §1009.02.0 establishes general standards and criteria that pertain to all conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing for the request on October 2, 2019, and having closed said public hearing, voted to recommend approval of the proposed amusement area based on the public record and the Planning Commission's deliberation; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has made the following findings regarding the general standards and criteria established in §1009.02.C: 1. The proposed use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan does not speak directly to the proposed use or the subject property,but the proposal is generally not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan because: a. It represents the Comprehensive Plan's broad goals promoting high quality reinvestment. b. A microbrewery among the office,bank, retail, lodging, and restaurant uses that surround it contributes to the commercial-area goal of"promot[ing] an appropriate mix of commercial development types within the community." 2. The proposed use is not in conflict with any Regulating Maps or other adopted plans. The site is not subject to a regulating map, nor is the proposed use in conflict with the previously approved PUD or its subsequent amendment. 3. The proposed use is not in conflict with any City Code requirements. Based on the plans that have been received and reviewed thus far, staff have not uncovered any City Code conflicts, and the proposed microbrewery must meet all applicable City Code regulations, or the applicant must secure any necessary variance approvals, in order to receive the required construction permits. Page 1 of 2