My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-1-7_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2020
>
2020-1-7_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/2/2020 3:36:39 PM
Creation date
1/2/2020 3:36:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
113evaluation: Responsiveness, Milestone Schedule, Interview, Cost, Risk Plan, Project Capability, <br />114Value Added Plan, and PastPerformance Information. <br />115 <br />116As part of Best Valueevaluation, all name information would be redacted from the proposals to <br />117ensure the team of evaluators base their evaluations on the merits of the proposals, not on the <br />118companies that they may know. <br />119 <br />120The Commission discussed generaltimeframes and funding options for the program. <br />121 <br />122Vice-Chair Hoag suggested adding the “Parks and Recreation Commission serves as the Tree <br />123Board” and “Roseville is a Tree City USA” to the proposal. <br />124 <br />125Staff noted that members of a potential evaluating committee have not been identified. However, it <br />126will have good representation fromcitystaff. <br />127 <br />1286)STAFF REPORT <br />129a.LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES <br />130The House Capital Investment Committee introduction and tour of the Guidant John Rose MN <br />131OVAL was well received and the comments from the group were positive. Commissioner <br />132O’Brienattended and noted that she felt the tour was very well organized and that the Committee <br />133was very engaged. <br />134 <br />135The City Council revisited their legislative priorities at their December 2, 2019 meeting and <br />136again has placed the MN OVAL funding and pursing a liquor license for the Cedarholm <br />137Community Building as a high priority. <br />138 <br />139b.REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CEDARHOLM COMMUNITY BUILDING AND <br />140GOLF COURSE GRILL/KITCHEN SERVICE <br />141Three proposals were received in response to the Cedarholm Community Building and Golf <br />142Course Grill/Kitchen Service Request for Proposal (RFP). The next step will be to review the <br />143proposals by a sub-committee next Wednesday at City Hall. Baggenstoss, Brown, Hoag and <br />144Stoner are part of the sub-committee and will be reporting back to the Commission on progress. <br />145Clarification interviews maytake place after the sub-committee reviewsinitial proposals. <br />146Criteria that will be used to score the proposals include scope of operation, operator resumes, <br />147menu (pricing and offering), and compensation terms. <br />148 <br />149Commissioner Arneson asked if the city would still pursue a liquor license if they choose to go <br />rd <br />150with a 3 party vendor. Staff confirmed that they would. <br />151 <br />152 <br />4 <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.