My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_1202
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_1202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 3:36:10 PM
Creation date
1/7/2020 3:36:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/2/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 2, 2019 <br /> Page 17 <br /> is also important and should be pursued because it was very close to getting <br /> passed but fell apart in the Senate. He thought hotel/motel licensing is a great op- <br /> portunity to build a coalition with other cities that have the same problems so staff <br /> can work on that. Taproom/cocktail room licenses might have some other fixes in <br /> the legislative process and staff is working with Mr. Blume on potentially some <br /> licenses that the city may be able to issue. He could provide some additional in- <br /> formation at the January 6th meeting. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated he starred two priority items, one was the OVAL <br /> and the other was hotel/motel licensing. Hotel/motel licensing is certainly some- <br /> thing that has taken up a lot of staff and community time and had a lot of negative <br /> influences on some folks so he would like to find a way forward. He hoped that <br /> can be moved to the top and have some of these other pieces cleared off or maybe <br /> with a clearer direction. He was also wondering about two things on the other <br /> priority lists; transportation funding and sprinkler system requirements and where <br /> the Council felt like those fit. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte thought the Council had them in that list because the <br /> Council figured there would be other people taking the lead on that and the City <br /> of Roseville can be supportive. Whereas the items on the top part of the list were <br /> what the city might actually have to take the lead on. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that still made sense from his perspective. He thought many of <br /> the items on the top of the list were updated policy documents and should include <br /> some of the latest developments, especially in the hotel/motel licensing where the <br /> city sees partnerships. If there is other legislation being proposed, references to <br /> that should be included and up-to-date. He thought that applied to many of these <br /> priorities. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was anything that came forward on the massage therapy <br /> licensing at the State level or any other identified partners that might be interested <br /> in that. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon explained there was no specific legislation introduced and more of <br /> the higher priority issues were the focus. But that can be pursued if the Council <br /> wants staff to spend time on it. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated he would like to be a little more informed on it and did not <br /> know if that was something the lobbyist would be able to tell them or what might <br /> be a strategy or thoughts on that one at some point. <br /> Mayor Roe noted on taproom/cocktail room priority was worthwhile to make sure <br /> the Council has the latest legislation that is being proposed by Mr. Blume. On the <br /> Cedarholm community building, staff may want to look at wording its policy flex- <br /> ibly so not only would the city be supportive of getting its own ability to license <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.