My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-5-5_PR_Comm_Min
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
2020-5-5_PR_Comm_Min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2020 3:55:39 PM
Creation date
6/10/2020 3:55:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Baggenstoss agreed that this proposal is premature for a vote. Especially, with the <br />amount of cashthat would be accepted vs. the amount that the developer is asking for the parcel <br />across the street. <br /> <br />The developers noted that they do not agree with the $4,000/unit price. Also, they reiterated the <br />steep grading of the property and the difficulty that poses. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baggenstoss asked if they have a purchase agreement for the property. The developer <br />confirmed that they do have a purchase agreement contingent on the rezoning with a purchase price <br />of $1,000,000. <br />Commissioner Baggenstoss questioned why the smaller plat across the street of only 1 acre would be <br />worth $650,000? The Developer noted that the land is worth a higher value, they have more money <br />into that property already and the parcel has received final plat approval from the city. <br />Chair Hoag questioned how the Park Dedication will change if the rezoning of this property is not <br />approved. The Developer noted that they went with a medium density option for people who want to <br />live here but don’t want to shovel snow or mow their lawn. However, per Roseville regulation they <br />could put 20 single family homes on this parcel. Their proposal is to put in 19 town houses. <br />Therefore, the only reason for the density request change is due to the single family townhouse <br />project. <br />Commissioner Baggenstoss questioned what happens to the project if the city requests the parkland <br />on Co. Rd. B. The developer responded that they do not know if the project would still go and they <br />don’t know how the Parks Department would fit it in there and keep it in safe. <br />Commissioner Stoner motioned to defera Park Dedicationrecommendation for Midland Legacy <br />Estates - 2395 County Road B W.until staff canfind out about the location across the street and <br />attempt to arrive at an agreeable price. Commissioner Baggenstoss seconded. <br /> <br />Staff noted that the parcel across the street is not tied to thePark Dedication recommendation item. <br />The Commission discussed the parcel across the street and zoning of the parcel. <br />The developer confirmed that regardless of the zoning they would be moving forward with <br />development of the property. <br />Commissioner Baggenstoss stated that we owe it to Roseville and especially the residents who live <br />in this area to table this and choose the best half acre location for a park on this parcel. <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.