My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_06-23_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2020
>
2020_06-23_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 8:33:30 AM
Creation date
6/23/2020 8:30:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/23/2020
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
127 Member Misra asked what the cost would be of typical corrections if the sump <br />128 pump does have a direct connection. <br />129 <br />130 Mr. Sandstrom explained on the cheaper side, if the sump pump pipe is running to <br />131 the sewer or to the laundry basket it is a couple hundred dollars at most. The more <br />132 expensive cost would be removing the foundation drain which is a more invasive <br />133 repair. <br />134 <br />135 Chair Cihacek asked who would pay for the inspection. <br />136 <br />137 Mr. Sandstrom indicated most cities have an inspection fee so the resident would <br />138 pay that fee. <br />139 <br />140 Chair Cihacek thought if someone had a third -party inspection done when selling <br />141 their home, the housing inspection should include a review of the sump pump <br />142 connection. If this were to be made a policy, the policy could state an inspection <br />143 must be done when selling a home either by a third party or by the city. <br />144 <br />145 Vice Chair Wozniak asked if Chair Cihacek was talking about requiring a home <br />146 inspection as a condition of selling a home. <br />147 <br />148 Chair Cihacek indicated that was correct but just for a sump pump, not necessarily <br />149 an entire house inspection. Many people prior to selling or buying a house will get <br />150 a house inspection done so at that point it makes sense for this requirement. <br />151 <br />152 Member Huiett explained she would not want this to be the one-off thing, if there <br />153 are no other requirements at point of sale. She wondered if there are any other <br />154 requirements that this would be lumped into for point of sale homes. <br />155 <br />156 Vice Chair Wozniak explained his questions was on the same line of thought. Is <br />157 the sump pump connection to sanitary sewer a code violation. <br />158 <br />159 Mr. Sandstrom indicated it is against the ordinance so would be in violation. <br />160 <br />161 Member Huiett asked what happens if the sump pump is connected to storm sewer. <br />162 <br />163 Mr. Culver explained the city still would not let anyone connect to the public storm <br />164 water system without some sort of permit or permission. <br />165 <br />166 Member Misra asked if staff had any idea of how many sump pumps are there in <br />167 the city. <br />168 <br />169 Mr. Culver explained based on some observations made during meter replacements, <br />170 when the city did a large-scale meter replacement a few years ago, staff believes <br />171 there are ten percent of the households have an illegally connected sump pump. <br />172 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.