My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_06-23_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2020
>
2020_06-23_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 8:33:30 AM
Creation date
6/23/2020 8:30:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/23/2020
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
173 Mr. Culver explained one option is to inspect the sump pump when doing meter <br />174 replacements which staff is a little hesitant on doing because the resident may then <br />175 refuse access to the meter for fear of the city catching something else. He noted if <br />176 the resident does not allow the city access to the home meter the ordinance does <br />177 allow the city to charge a "denial of access" fee which would be implemented onto <br />178 the water bill quarterly. Staff does not want to discourage residents from making <br />179 the appointment for meter replacement. <br />180 <br />181 Member Huiett explained she was concerned with the messaging of catching illegal <br />182 sump pump connections and thought the better point of view is addressing the rain <br />183 event in the most sustainable ways with several strategies that could be done instead <br />184 of the fear of it being an illegal thing. Maybe give alternatives to sump pumps such <br />185 as rain gardens and list those. She thought the broader message should be more to <br />186 the point. <br />187 <br />188 Vice Chair Wozniak indicated a number of other cities have tried the different <br />189 approaches that were outlined in the presentation and he wondered if there was any <br />190 feedback from the other cities on what, if any impact, it had on UI in those cities. <br />191 N <br />192 Mr. Sandstrom explained he worked for West St. Paul for two years and the city <br />193 started with a blanket policy because the city had a very large amount that had to <br />194 be offset due to the Met Council surcharge. The city went away from the blanket <br />195 policy because the city required sewer repairs to be done and found the roads had <br />196 many patches and looked like quilts and subsequently had a lot of issues with the <br />197 resulting pavement conditions. He reviewed the process West St. Paul went <br />198 through. <br />199 <br />200 Mr. Culver indicated some of the communities have had more interaction with the <br />201 Met Council and the Met Council has come down on them harder with more fees <br />202 for flow exceeding what Met Council allows. He noted Roseville has been more <br />203 aggressive with its sewer linings and has done other things to significantly lower <br />204 the flow rates. The city is making progress on that. <br />205 <br />206 Member Misra asked if Roseville had much residential drain tile. <br />207 <br />208 Mr. Culver thought a majority of homes in Roseville have internal drainage <br />209 systems, like foundation drain tiles. Those would be connected to a sump pump. <br />210 <br />211 Member Misra asked if that was prevalent in Roseville. <br />212 <br />213 Mr. Culver thought it was. <br />214 <br />215 6. Sustainable Roseville Update <br />216 Public Works Director Marc Culver explained in 2012, Roseville took amore active <br />217 role in making the city more sustainable. Staff will look for input from the <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.