My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_08-25_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2020
>
2020_08-25_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2020 11:52:08 AM
Creation date
9/18/2020 11:49:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/25/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�: <br />81 5. Transportation Project Updates <br />82 Mr. Culver provided a brief review and update on transportation project listed in <br />83 the staff report dated July 28, 2020. <br />84 <br />85 Mr. Culver reviewed the Larpenteur Avenue 3 Lane Section project. <br />86 <br />87 Member Spencer indicated he lived by this project and he thought the restriping <br />88 and three lane of Larpenteur at Dale, the test section, has been wonderful for that <br />89 section of road. He would like to see this done at the intersection at Dale too. <br />90 <br />91 Member Huiett indicated along with the follow-up study she would be curious to <br />92 see if the bus stops have had any ridership improvement or increase/decrease in <br />93 ridership as well. <br />94 <br />95 Mr. Culver reviewed the County Road B2 at Lexington Project with the <br />96 Commission. <br />97 <br />98 Member Hammer indicated she lived on County Road B2 when the sidewalks went <br />99 in and there are often many opinions and she commended staff putting this together <br />100 with resident comments and input and she thought this was really transparent. She <br />101 noted the intersection of Victoria and B2 is also a busy street with a stop sign and <br />102 she wondered if this will improve the traffic flow for these intersections or is that <br />103 something that will be looked at as a result of this improvement. <br />104 <br />105 Mr. Culver indicated the danger of doing improvements at one particular spot, <br />106 particularly with capacity is what will be the impact of that intersection <br />107 downstream. hi this case, it could be both east bound and west bound. If there <br />108 continues to be issues the intersections will be looked at in the future. <br />109 <br />110 Mr. Culver reviewed the Rosedale Environmental Assessment Worksheet with the <br />111 Commission. <br />112 <br />113 Chair Wozniak suggested the Commissioners look at the EAW, even though it has <br />114 been approved, to get to know some of the components of it. This is a huge project <br />115 and will have significant impact on the community. He thought the traffic study <br />116 that was done was based on a different count of residential units then what is <br />117 actually being proposed. He thought the ones currently being proposed are more <br />118 then what was in the traffic study and indicated he would like Mr. Culver to take a <br />119 look at that. He also noted there are two new businesses the city Council approved <br />120 along Fairview and the Macy's parking lot and those will also have impacts on the <br />121 traffic as well. He wondered how that will figure into traffic counts. <br />122 <br />123 Mr. Culver indicated as a part of the Conditional Use Permit needed for the drive- <br />124 throughs for those uses, the traffic numbers were updated. <br />125 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.