My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-10-6_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2020
>
2020-10-6_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 2:57:59 PM
Creation date
10/1/2020 2:57:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
161 o After Pocahontas’ death, war resumes <br />162 o Takeaways: <br />163 Bridge between two cultures <br />164 Story of peace <br />165 Powhatan Version of Events <br />166 o Pocahontas name <br />167 o 1607: Native people offer to help starving colonists <br />168 o Early interaction between Pocahontas <br />169 Pocahontas could not have/did not save John Smith <br />170 o 1609 – 1610: Colonists starve <br />171 o 1610 – 1613: Tensions/fighting occurs between the Powhatan and colonists <br />172 o 1912 – 1913: Pocahontas marries Koccum, has a child <br />173 o 1614: Pocahontas kidnapped, husband killed and forced to give up her first child <br />174 o 1616: Marriage to Rolfe, child Thomas born <br />175 o 1616: Trip to England. We can “civilize” Native Americans. During her time in <br />176 England Pocahontas learned that England plans to send many more settlers to grow <br />177 tobacco. She says that she will tell her tribe of these plans. <br />178 o 1617: Pocahontas dies. Speculation that she may have been killed before she returned <br />179 to the United States in order to prevent her from providing her tribe with the <br />180 information she learned while in England. <br />181 o Publication of English narrative occurs after Pocahontas and many other key players <br />182 have died. <br />183 <br />184 Commissioner Heikkila questioned what the city’s policy is for naming parks after people. Staff <br />185 responded that it is currently significant contributions. <br />186 <br />187 Commissioner Arneson noted that if a park name brings bad feelings or shame and it is not related to <br />188 Roseville he agrees with looking into the process of changing its name. <br />189 <br />190 Commissioner O’Brien relayed that it is appropriate for new names or renaming of a park to come <br />191 before the Parks and Recreation Commission. She cautioned the Commission to carefully consider <br />192 how to rename the park. If choosing to consider continuing with a name that honors our native <br />193 population the Commission should speak with appropriate tribal leadership and gain their input. <br />194 However, it may also be good to consider using the current criteria laid out in our guidelines so as to <br />195 avoid potentially choosing a name that could become controversial in the future as peoples <br />196 viewpoints on names and events change over time. <br />197 <br />198 Chair Hoag requested that staff provide an engagement process and name change recommendation <br />199 timeline. <br />200 <br />5 <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.