My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-10-6_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2020
>
2020-10-6_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 2:57:59 PM
Creation date
10/1/2020 2:57:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
201 Chair Hoag also noted that the Commission received two electronic messages that had similar <br />202 sentiment to all of the community members who commented at the meeting tonight. <br />203 <br />204 Commissioner Baggenstoss said that he felt it was a good time for the Commission to do some <br />205 listening to our indigenous community members. <br />206 <br />207 Commissioner Stoner commented that he felt park names serve the main purpose of helping to <br />208 identify and differentiate parks within the community. If this specific name is causing concerns it <br />209 should definitely be changed. Youth Commissioner Carlson agreed as it does not meet the current <br />210 park naming criteria and people are asking for the change. <br />211 <br />212 Commissioner Baggenstoss said that he is excited to bring a decision that is honored and brought <br />213 forth from an underrepresented group. Also, he reinforced that this will need to be a responsible <br />214 decision. Not a decision that feels like it is “ours”. <br />215 <br />216 The Commission discussed timelines and process for potentially changing the name of Pocahontas <br />217 Park. <br />218 <br />219 Commissioner O’Brien commented that it could be decided at tonight’s meeting that the <br />220 Commission would like to move forward with changing the name of Pocahontas Park. In addition, it <br />221 could be decided if the name should be a generic name or if it should honor a group of people/idea. <br />222 <br />223 Commissioner Hoag cautioned moving forward with any decisions this evening without a timeline <br />224 from staff on next steps. <br />225 <br />226 Staff reminded the Commission that they are a recommending body and that the first step of any <br />227 timeline would need to be understanding if this is something that the City Council would be <br />228 interested in changing. <br />229 <br />230 Commissioner Baggenstoss reiterated that the Commission needs to bring the non-dominant culture <br />231 voice to the table and make that voice more important than the dominant culture’s voice. If we hear <br />232 from the non-dominant culture and they begin to feel that their voice is trusted in city government <br />233 that is a win for everyone. <br />234 <br />235 Commissioner Hoag noted that he feels it is premature to bring it to the City Council and he would <br />236 be hesitant to rush the process. <br />237 <br />238 <br />239 <br />240 <br />6 <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.