Laserfiche WebLink
AttachmentA <br />�*ZEHLERS <br />N PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Michelle Pietrick, Finance Director <br />FROM: Stacie Kvilvang and Jeanne Vogt, Ehlers <br />DATE: October 19, 2020 <br />SUBJECT: Utility Rate Study <br />The City of Roseville contracted with Ehlers to complete a utility rate study ("the Study") of the <br />water utility and storm drainage utility funds. The scope of work for the Study included: <br />• Balancing who's using the system with who's paying for the system <br />• Building and maintaining adequate cash balances <br />• Funding future capital projects <br />• Managing revenue volatility (review of fixed fees and user rates) <br />• Competitiveness <br />Overall Impact on Utility Customers <br />Attached is the Impact Analysis for "Residential" and "Other Users" of the system. We looked at <br />quartiles, which is defined as the number of accounts in the bottom quarter (2S% quartile), mid- <br />point (SO%quartile) and top quarter (7S%quartile) oftotal users. Also included in "Other Accounts" <br />is the City's largest commercial account at the 100% quartile. <br />Bottom Line: There are two options up for consideration. Both look at shifting the burden of <br />who is paying from residential users to high industrial users. This means most residential users <br />can expect a decrease in their quarterly bills. This is part of balancing who's using with who's <br />paying for the system, as discussed below. It is important to note, the projected 2021 water <br />and storm drainage rates include inflationary increases, similar to past years. <br />Both of our rate structure options are considered "revenue neutral". This means we design <br />rate structures that will generate only enough revenue needed to maintain adequate fund <br />balances. For example, because we are recommending increased usage charges, we are also <br />recommending reduced fixed rates. <br />Below are brief summaries of how the goals included in the scope of work were met: <br />Balancing Who's Using vs. Who's Paying <br />Included in our analysis is a comparison by customer class of who is using water to who is paying. <br />Currently, residential customers use 41.47% of total water, but pay for S6.26%. Apartments, <br />commercial, and irrigation accounts all pay for less than what they currently use. Both options <br />look at balancing the current disparity going forward, with Option #1 being closer to the goal. <br />Building and Maintaining Adequate Cash Balances <br />The Water and Storm Drainage Funds currently have cash balances that are either negative or at <br />$0. The Study looks at how the City can define appropriate cash balance reserves and provide a <br />BUILDING COMMUNITIES. ITS WHAT WE DO. 0 Inro@enters-Inc.com 1, 1 (800) 552-1171 9 www.ehlers-Inacom <br />