2021-3-2_PR_Comm Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

7. A concern was raised regarding the developer’sinterest in any potential builders and it was confirmed that the that the developer is not going to build homes directly but will sell lots to builders who will build homes on the properties. 8. A concern was raised regarding the sidewalks in the area and the fact that it is potentially difficult to reverse the area for both pedestrians and bicyclists. The developer confirmed that there will take every step possible tocontinue the existing trail work and comply with city requirements with regard to trails and sidewalks. 9.The concern was raised regarding tree removal and the site. Developer responded and confirmed that truly minimal and that by individually grading sites rather than mass grading the project pre removal can be mitigated. Additionally,tree protection for the trees that will be kept on the property will be provided during grading which includes protecting the trees and the root base during construction of the site paths. 10.Concern was raised regarding the wooded nature of an area and that is very important to the community. The developer agrees completely that the wooded nature of the city is important and that it will be the responsibility of builder Ann developer to clean up the debris and not disturb any trees unnecessarily. 11. The question was raised about sewer and water being stubbed to the property and it was confirmed that that is the intention of the developer. 12. Plans for stormwater management and drainage issues was raised by a constituent. The developer responded that the engineers are working with the watershed district 2 ensure no damage from runoff water will occur and that there will be a common infiltration system on the property in a location to be determined. 13. Installation of sewer and water services is anticipated in the summer and fall of 2021 which will result in the manage shutdown of Victoria St with County highway approval for any shutdown. 14. A concern was raised with regard to the proposed last six and seven and whether they were big enough for two separate lots. Additionally, one community member was very concerned that both lots on their own were too small and solely designed to increase profit for the developer and that two homes would not be in the character of the neighborhood. The developer indicated they would look at that issue and make a determination as to the size and advisability of two lots in that location. The developer has subsequently determined that one lot is appropriate for that location rather than two. 15. A concern was raised with regard to how many homes would have to be removed for the project. Developer confirmed that no homes are planned for removal.